The original
script of this podcast:
http://www.nature.com/nature/podcast/v483/n7390/nature-2012-03-22.html
The audio
file of this podcast: http://www.nature.com/nature/podcast/archive.html
元グリーンピース活動家の研究者が、絶滅したタンパク質を再生し、タンパク質の進化の過程を証明。結果的にインテリジェントデザイン説(自然は偶然に進化してきたにしてはあまりにも巧妙・精緻につくられているため神によるものだとしか説明できないという考え)の論拠も崩した。現在はステロイドホルモン受容体の起源となる6~8億年前のホルモンを再生。これらのホルモンの中には公害に強く反応するものがあり、自然保護活動時代の課題とつながっている。
Helen
Pearson: Well, Joe specializes
in working out the sequence of ancient proteins, so ones that have been extinct
for hundreds of millions of years which he goes and resurrects, so he brings
them back to life. So he can study them in the lab.
Helen
Pearson: It means he can
experimentally test ideas about how these proteins evolved. So, his lab has
become one of the leading ones in this field of ancestral protein resurrection
and he has used this to workout in great detail, for example, how a hormone and
receptor pair evolved to the point where he can actually workout the precise
mutations that caused the receptor to switch many millions of years ago from
one hormone to another.
Geoff
Marsh: And through his work he uses it as a way to, sort of,
refute the claims of intelligent design advocates.
Helen
Pearson: He didn't set out to
refute intelligent design but some of his work has ended up doing so. So, some
of these complex systems he worked on and that we heard him talk about have
been pointed to by proponents of intelligent design as being so complex that
only a divine force could have created them but what Joe does is he goes in and
works out in great detail in fact how evolution could have produced these
systems step by step. So his work has been taken as a refutation of some of
these ideas of intelligent design.
Helen
Pearson: Many of his friends
and colleagues describe him as very intense and he is in some ways. He thinks
very carefully before he speaks. It was a pleasure to spend time with him in
his lab – they're just this regular molecular biology lab, but at the same time
they have this minus 80 degree freezer which is packed with proteins which were
extinct which is kind of mind blowing. And the other thing which makes him very
interesting as a person is that he had a very unconventional route into science
so long before he was doing ancestral protein resurrection, he worked as an
environmental activist for Greenpeace in which he campaigned against the
release of toxic chemicals. He dropped out of Yale to go into activism. He
didn't even take a molecular biology course until he was 30. So all in all a
very interesting person to spend time with.
Helen
Pearson: He has been interested
in this family of proteins, the steroid hormones receptors for really long time
since his Greenpeace days. So, these are receptors that bind hormones such as
oestrogens and progesterones and androgens and they're crucial in driving these
processes in development and the interesting thing is that particularly one of
these receptors, the oestrogen hormone receptors exquisitely sensitive to
pollutants as well. So there's an interesting mirror to his former life. So,
one of the things he is working on now is looking at the common ancestor of
this entire hormone family which is about 600 to 800 million years old and he has
resurrected this protein. What's amazing is that he is studying proteins which
are hundreds of millions of years old using some of the most sophisticated
biochemical techniques you can think of to look at them and he has used this
for example to understand how this ancient common ancestor of the family which
were sensitive to oestrogens evolved step by step to certain mutations to
become sensitive to other hormones.
ICチップならぬ腸チップ: コイン大の透明ポリマーチップに通した溝の中にヒトの腸細胞をはり、腸内細菌を繁殖させたり、組織を収縮させたりできる。薬品開発への応用が考えられている。
Corie
Lok: You can put transistors on a chip, but how about a
human organ. Harvard researchers have developed a chip that mimics the
structure and physiology of a human intestine. The device, about the size of a
coin, is made out of a clear polymer and has two microscopic fluid channels,
separating the channels is a flexible membrane covered by human cells that
normally line the gut. The researchers could grow a common gut bacterium on
this layer of cells and they could even simulate the contractions of intestines
by applying suction through two side chambers. The researchers
say their device could be used in drug development to screen molecules. We at Nature like this paper because this gut on a chip
appears to be a better intestinal mimic than static cell cultures. You can find
the paper in the Journal Lab on a Chip. Nature 483, 376 (22 March 2012)
抗生物質を使用しても生き残る菌がいるのはなぜか?大腸菌の場合、抗生物質を使うとインドールという物質による細胞間の連絡が起こる。インドールはストレスに反応する遺伝子を活性化する。この発見は耐性菌研究に役立つ。
Switching our focus to microbiology, researchers have
figured out why some bacterial cells can survive the onslaught of antibiotics
even though they're genetically identical to ones that die. It turns out that
at least in E. coli these so-called persister cells
arise because of signalling between bacterial cells, using a chemical they
normally produce called Indole. Cells treated with chemical were able to
withstand higher levels of antibiotics than untreated bacteria. The researchers
found that Indole activates genes that help cells respond to stress. This paper
caught our eye because it sheds light on how persister cells come about which
is important because these cells have been implicated in chronic infections
such as tuberculosis. This paper was published in the Journal Nature Chemical Biology. Nature 483, 377 (22 March 2012)(Cry of an
elk)
脳も免疫細胞によって守られている。 マウスの研究で、神経疾患のレット症候群の原因が、免疫細胞起源のミクログリア細胞の不全にもあるらしいことが分かった。レット症候群マウスと免疫不全マウスの症状に共通点があることが発見のきっかけ。レット症候群マウスは骨髄移植によりほぼ完治。ヒトのレット症候群治療に骨髄移植を使うかどうかはメカニズム解明を待ってから。現在、研究はミクログリア細胞の改善方法に向けられている。
Geoff
Marsh: Rett Syndrome, a severe neurodevelopmental disease
affects as many as one in ten thousand females. They have trouble learning to
speak and coordinate their movements. Their growth is stunted and many develop
serious breathing problems called apneas. Scientists have thought that these
symptoms were due to malfunctioning neurons, but now research in a mouse
version of the disease shows that immune cells in the brain may also be
involved. These brain immune cells are called microglia, they are macrophages,
cells that gobble up cellular trash. Jonathan Kipnis and his team at the
University of Virginia have found that replacing the brain's microglia
alleviates some symptoms of Rett Syndrome in mice. Ewen Callaway gave Jonathan
a call.
Jonathan
Kipnis: So the microglia are
the macrophages of the brain. Every tissue has its own macrophages. Unlike
every other cell in the brain, the microglia are not from the origin or neurons
or other glial cells. They are coming from immune progenitors.
Jonathan
Kipnis: Well, this goes back
to our other work, where we showed the effect of immune cells on brain function
and learning and memory and so the idea was because Rett mice manifest many of
the symptoms that we see in immune-deficient mice. For instance they're
cognitively impaired, they have reduced levels of BDMF which is Brain-derived
neurotrophic factor and so we approached, we thought okay, we will just
replenish the whole immune system.
Ewen
Callaway: Tell me what effects
you saw when you gave the Rett syndrome mice a bone marrow transplant from the
mice that didn't have Rett syndrome.
Jonathan
Kipnis: So, We take a male
mouse at four weeks of age and we gave it him a full body irradiation to
eliminate their own bone marrow in the immune system and we gave them an
infusion of the wild-type bone marrow, in a hope to see a little bit of
extension of life and hopefully improvement of some of the symptoms of the
disease and then when we looked at mice at 8 weeks of age the mice looked much
better than their counterparts which either received their own bone marrow or the
intravenous treatments and were about to die and were actually dying and then
at 10 weeks of age when most of the control mice have died, those mice with
transplantation, they were almost perfectly normal, So the results were beyond
and above anything we had expected from this approach.
Ewen
Callaway: What about the
symptoms? Did the bone marrow transplant correct any of those?
Jonathan
Kipnis: Yeah, this is a very
good question, so actually yes, apneas were almost completely abolished. So,
the mice still have abnormal breathing pattern but there is no apneas and
apneas are very severe in kids; so this is very important that the apneas have
been eliminated. Also the mice's gait was substantially improved and probably
most importantly is their activity in the open field. So usually when you put a
sick mouse, red mouse it's not really moving but these mice were exploring and
they were moving around. So they were overall looking and feeling better.
Ewen
Callaway: Do you have any clues
as to how the bone marrow transplant worked?
Jonathan
Kipnis: When we did the
irradiation in order to clean the endogenous bone marrow in the immune cells,
we covered the brains of this mice, so the irradiation does not heat the brain
and then we inject bone marrow there was no repopulation of microglia, because
the brain wasn't affected by the radiation so there is no place for new cells
to get into the brain and to repopulate the brain. So, we know that it's not
the peripheral immunity that mediates the effect but rather we need the
engraftment of microglia. They maybe, do not make neurons healthy but they make
them, they make their environment much healthier.
Ewen
Callaway: Could you think your
study pinpoints these microglia cells and their role clearing this junk as the
cause of Rett Syndrome?
Jonathan
Kipnis: I would not claim that
the microglia is the cause of Rett Syndrome. It just shows that it supports
cells in the brain, the glia cells, even if the neurons don't have normal
protein if the support cells are perfectly functioning then you could alleviate
many aspects of the disease.
Ewen
Callaway: And do you think
doctors should look as to whether a bone marrow transplant may help children
and adults even with this condition?
Jonathan
Kipnis: So, we need to be very
cautious when we're talking about moving from the mouse experiment to humans,
but I am not sure that I can really if anything but in my mind we need to
understand better what are these new microglia doing, .how bone marrow
transplantation works, what are the cells that are important to be replaced and
only then I think will be ready for the clinical trials.
Ewen
Callaway: Are there other ways
to make microglia work better?
Jonathan
Kipnis: This is exactly where
our research is heading right now, is to try understand how can we take a
girl's own macrophages of the microglia and make them work better. Honestly as
a scientist that's where my hope is. Not as much with the bone marrow
transplantation but with now finding drugs that would circumvent the need for
transplantation.
動物実験に反対する活動家たちが、北米等への実験用動物の空輸を止めている。この状況が続けば、実験用動物の産出国に研究所が移転し始めることも考えられる。
Richard
Van Noorden: This is a new
technique from animal activists, antivivisection people who seem to have found
a new way to disrupt the transport of primates around the world. Now in the UK
last week, it emerged that ferry companies had refused to transport all
research animals including mice into the country and we have a wider story
looking at disruption to flights around the world from places where primates
are bred like Mauritius and China into the places that use them like Canada and
America.
Richard Van Noorden: Well exactly, essentially this is disrupting
the flow of primates into American labs and what's actually happening right now
is a bit of a bottleneck where all the animals are being kept back in their
breeding colonies and in the labs at the moment they're not quite feeling the
pinch, because they've got a lot of experiments going on. The scientists are
very worried about where their primates are going to come from and this isn't
just US problem. Air France is facing mounting pressures, the last major
European carrier to transport research primates and Air Canada is petitioning
the Canadian Transportation Agency for permission to refuse the transport
research primates.
Richard
Van Noorden: There doesn't seem to
be anything specific about the conditions; it's just that animal rights
activists say this is a way to stop primate research happening, to stop the
flow of primates around the globe. Now scientists say well, you know, our
priority is humane treatment of animals and air travel is the fastest and least
stressful way of transporting them and the other thing they say , as well
suppose we do restrict transport of animals, what's going to happen, scientists
will just go to Singapore, India, Malaysia, China, where you can basically
drive animals, if you need to transport them which is not as good but you can
do it and just do work there where the research is less heavily regulated
anyway.
多くのホルモンの受容体となるタンパク質の結晶構造が分析できるようになった。これはノーベル賞レベルの進展。たとえばこの方法を用いて鎮静剤受容器の構造が分かり、薬と反応させることができるようになれば、副作用なしで鎮静効果のみを得ることが可能になる。
Richard
Van Noorden: Well, this is a family
of really massively important receptor proteins, the G protein coupled
receptors which my biological lessons will immediately recognize as ubiquitous,
cell surface molecules that basically many things activate hormones,
neurotransmitters, smells, light they all do their work in the cell by
activating these receptors In fact these are the targets of a third to half of
all drugs. But incredibly up until 2007, we couldn't solve any of these crystal
structures, because we just couldn't get the proteins to crystallize but then
this incredible breakthrough happens and Brian Kobilka lab at Stanford
published the first few structures which will probably win the Nobel prize and
this week we have reports on two more crystal structures from Kobilka lab and
from Ray Steven's group, at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla and that
means that five of these structures have been published this year and in total
we have 14 results, so there is a sudden wave of these critically important
proteins being solved.
Richard
Van Noorden: Well, the ones this
week are the opioid receptors, so these are the targets of drugs like morphine,
codeine, pain killing, sedative effects. These receptors basically mediate the
effects like analgesia, euphoria sedation. So, we can understand what these
receptors look like and have the drugs interact with them and we can work how
to design drugs that do the things we want opioids to do without the unwanted
side effects. So, we're already seeing for example that these proteins are very
sort of large gaping binding pockets which may explain why the actions of
opioids can turn on so quickly and be rapidly reversed because many different
types of molecules can quickly bind in and out of the pockets.
ニュートリノは光より速くないことが、数メートルしか離れていない別の探知機による測定で確認された。別件だが、ニュートリノを岩盤を通して送受信し、”Neutrino”というメッセージ送信に成功。応用目的はないが基礎研究として重要。
Richard
Van Noorden: We have reassuring
news and exciting news and the reassuring news is the neutrinos don't travel
faster than light as far as we know. We know new results with an Italian
experiment called ICARUS and these experiments actually sit just a few meters
away from each other talking about the OPERA experiment which last September
found that neutrinos travelling from about CERN 730 km all the way to the Gran
Sasso laboratory in Italy, travelled 60 nano seconds faster than light would
have. Well the ICARUS experiment which is another box shaped detector just a
few meters away well that's found that they don't. So it looks like there was
some kind of glitch in the original experiment which to be honest we kind of
already thought looks like, it's Einstein was right after all and the neutrinos
are just travelling as fast as we expected.
Kerri
Smith: Now the standard model can breathe a sigh of relief?
Richard
Van Noorden: Exactly but in other
exciting neutrino news, physicists have successfully transmitted a message from
an accelerator to a detector using neutrinos through solid rock. So, that's
kind of exciting solid rock in the way you couldn't transmit a message with
light but these scientists have used a MINERvA detector of Fermilab and they've
spelled out the word Neutrino by sending the
neutrinos through the rock. Now this is completely useless. It's great news
that we've have underground bunker aligned with the particle accelerator and
loads of iron, lead, helium, water and plastic from the detector lying around
and it took over two hours to send the message Neutrino
but you know they've done it. This is Neutrino communication.
Kerri
Smith: Well, here at Nature we
love a good proof of principle right even if it is completely useless.
Richard
Van Noorden: Exactly, that is the
essence of blue sky science.
生態系の音をとり続けている人の話: 自然の音は互いに調和してオーケストラになっており、その中で暮らす人間の生活音も調和している。ある生態系の健康度はその場所を10秒間録音して分析すれば分かる。更に、ある生態系の開発開始前と一年後の音を比較すると、視覚的には影響がないようでも音声的には大きく変化している。また、生き物の喜怒哀楽的瞬間をとらえることもある。
Bernie
Krause: When I first started
as a musician of course I was recording natural sounds and kind of
decontextualising them abstracting them and taking them out of context and when
you fracture the natural world that way you get a very limited perspective of
what it shows. And so as I began to record I began to think well maybe there's
something else happening here and we have to listen to and I began to record
all habitats. Number one it was structured and number two that there were still
human groups living closely connected to the natural world who understand this
structure and use it as natural Karaoke Orchestra with which they perform.
Because of this kind of proto-orchestration we learned our music from them and
that's what we got it and we got our music first followed by language. I was
sent by the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco to Kenya to record
and it was there that I first heard the organized sound of the natural
soundscape.
Bernie
Krause: First of all how much
noise is there, secondly how the density and diversity of critter life has
changed though with time and then the natural soundscape gives us feedback.
Because we can then tell how things are changing within a given habitat very
quickly by doing a 10 second recording and analyzing that 10 second recording
we were able to tell exactly how healthy that habitat is. It's remarkable.
Kerri
Smith: Some ecologists are using the method?
Bernie
Krause: They are being used to
evaluate certain habitats throughout the world and I was the first really to
suggest this as a model for evaluation. The organizations that were collecting
natural sounds, these sounds were abstracted and deconstructed. There are
sounds taken out of context. Now I as a musician think of things in a much
larger context. I think of orchestration, I think of the way that instruments
fit together and so I came to natural soundscapes with that idea and I thought
well how do these critters hear one another if they get in each other's way.
Well, in fact they don't. In a healthy habitat they structure their voices in
bandwidth that's unique to their particular biological status if would one call
it that.
Kerri
Smith: Krause has also recorded clips of the same environment
years apart to show the difference that humans have had on these natural areas
and soundscapes.
Bernie
Krause: One of the examples
that I use in the book to create animal orchestra is a site that is just a year
apart, a year before and then after selective logging took place, a place
called Lincoln Meadows. It's about a four-hour drive from east of San
Francisco. In 1988,I went there to record and I was told by the logging company
that selective logging, a new model for logging would have absolutely no effect
on the biosphere. The sound is always under the radar where a visual culture in
the west. However sound tells a very different story. You know a picture is
worth a thousand of words but a soundscape is worth a thousand pictures.
Bernie
Krause: Well, the most
remarkable sound I have ever heard recorded by a colleague Curt Olson is the
sound of a wounded beaver. Curt had been recording at this lake in Minnesota
from many, many years and he always recorded there because there was a beaver
dam at the outlet. Three springs ago he was recording there and a couple of
hammock wardens came to the pond and stuck some sticks of dynamite down the dam
and blew it up, destroying the female and offspring that had just been born and
Curt captured that night the sound of this lone male beaver swimming in circles
around this pond looking for its mate. It's the saddest sound I've ever heard.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。