2026年8月7日金曜日

TOEFL iBT Wriging for an Academic Discussion The significance and impact of art on individuals and communities (Revised)

Art has been an integral part of human culture for millennia, serving various purposes and taking countless forms. From ancient cave paintings to contemporary digital installations, art reflects and shapes our experiences, values, and identities. In your opinion, what are some of the roles of art in society today? Discuss their significance and impact on individuals and communities.

 

 

 

Lets Think

1.       In medieval ages art played a significant role in delivering religious teachings in the form of pictures in churches and temples. Does art play the same kind of role today?

2.       Share examples of Wendy’s idea of the role of art.

3.       Share examples of Adrian’s idea of the role of art.

 

 

Hints for Points

Impacts of Art on Individuals

1.        It increases our knowledge about the world and humans through their expressions.

2.        It helps us (to) develop our emotions, sensitivity, and sense of beauty.

3.        It cultivates our imagination and creativity.

4.        It protects the best part of human soul by purifying it by processing reality with formalized expressions. It can save an individual’s soul through healing, fascination, passion, and faith.

5.        It records what photographs and videos cannot record. In other words, it records what happens in our mind.

 

Impacts of Art on Community

1.        Art develops culture by making it colorful and layered. It enriches our lives. Like other cultures, art makes our lives different from those of animals. It makes meaning in our everyday behavior.

2.        It makes people aware of issues. e.g. Fahrenheit 9.11 and other Michael Moore movies

3.        It helps create a movement. e.g. Anti-war movement, B.L.M., etc.

4.        It creates styles and fashion. e.g. American fashion in the 1970s and the street fashion in New York

5.        It tells the stories of human society and history.

 

 

Sample Response for Ideas and Expressions  (Written first in 2024)

ThesisAlthough I have been a worshipper of art and have shared the same expectations for art to make a breakthrough in society by raising awareness about issues as Wendy points out, I became skeptical of it recently due to the silence of most artists about the ongoing Israeli genocide on Gaza.

Supporting DetailsFor over 9 months, during which time the world witnessed the deaths of more than 160,000 Palestinians due to attacks and lack of necessities inflicted on them by Israel, whose officials call them human animals, there has been an eerie silence among major artists, revealing their true nature as a cog of the machine. The huge screens above Shibuya Crossing never show a pop-star condemning the crime against humanity, let alone the horrible images from Gaza. There is no big anti-war concert like Woodstock. It took 7 months for Macklemore’s “Hinds Hall” to be online for awareness and donation. It was uplifting but still was after Gaza was totally flattened.

Counterargument-treatmentThere are exceptions. Graffiti artist Banksy, for instance, keeps trying to raise awareness of issues. Some artists like the rock legend Roger Waters, Francis Coppola of Documentary Michael Moore, and the walking resistance Tom Morello from Rage Against the Machine had been vocal about the apartheid and atrocities for decades and were the first to defend Palestinians after October 7th. Artists4Ceasefire.org, consisting of 400 artists, was organized immediately after October 7 and called for actions. Actress Suzan Sarandon lost her job for criticizing Israel in a month or so. In Japan, Mr. Furusawa, an actor and activist, performs with pro-Palestinian signs in Tokyo every day. Kazehito Seki, a noise musician, has been jailed for months for spray-painting graffiti saying, “FREE GAZA” on government properties, and there are some other artists using their skills to tell the truth. However, all the other artists around the world keep their mouth shut on this crime of the century, and thus the public won’t pay much attention to the issue. The same happened in the past. Charlie Chaplin made “The Great Dictator” when Hitler Nazis was on its zenith. He was exceptional, but his action was an exception. Most artists during WWII were silent. Many even helped boost the fighting spirit. Both were complicit with slaughters. Most artists today are complicit with the massacre of innocent children, women, and men.

ConclusionMost of the power of art is in the artists, and when most artists are not compassionate and courageous enough to do their jobs to help their fellow humans who have been exposed to illegitimate punishment, I cannot pay any homage to those who call themselves artists. Their roles in society are no different from any other ordinary workers’, and with them art never challenges or changes the status quo, never transcending the dark side of the humankind. (465 words)


TOEFL iBT Wriging for an Academic Discussion A period or event in history that is most valuable to learn (Revised)

The study of history provides us with valuable lessons and perspectives. Throughout time, various periods and events have had profound impacts on societies, shaping the world we live today. In your opinion, which period or event in history is most valuable to learn? Why?

 

 

 

Let’s Think

Make a presentation on the historic period of your choice, answering the following questions.

1)     What impact did the period or event have on today’s society?

2)     How beneficial is it to learn it?

 

 

Hints for Points     Here are some excerpts from History.com.

The Internet (World Wide Web): On April 30, 1993, four years after publishing a proposal for “an idea of linked information systems,” computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee releases the source code for the world’s first web browser and editor. Originally called Mesh, the browser that he dubbed WorldWideWeb becomes the first royalty-free, easy-to-use means of browsing the emerging information network that developed into the internet as we know it today.

 

Berners-Lee was a fellow at CERN, the research organization headquartered in Switzerland. Other research institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University had developed complex systems for internally sharing information, and Berners-Lee sought a means of connecting CERN’s system to others. He outlined a plan for such a network in 1989 and developed it over the following years. The computer he used, a NeXT desktop, became the world’s first internet server. Berners-Lee wrote and published the first web page, a simplistic outline of the WorldWideWeb project, in 1991.

 

 

Climate Change: Climate change is the long-term alteration in Earth’s climate and weather patterns. It took nearly a century of research and data to convince the vast majority of the scientific community that human activity could alter the climate of our entire planet. In the 1800s, experiments suggesting that human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases could collect in the atmosphere and insulate Earth were met with more curiosity than concern. By the late 1950s, CO2 readings would offer some of the first data to corroborate the global warming theory. Eventually an abundance of data, along with climate modeling and real-world weather events would show not only that global warming was real, but that it also presented a host of catastrophic consequences.

 

 

NATO and Cold War

In 1949, the prospect of further Communist expansion prompted the United States and 11 other Western nations to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The Soviet Union and its affiliated Communist nations in Eastern Europe founded a rival alliance, the Warsaw Pact, in 1955. The alignment of nearly every European nation into one of the two opposing camps formalized the political division of the European continent that had taken place since World War II (1939-45). This alignment provided the framework for the military standoff that continued throughout the Cold War (1945-91).

 

 

Nuclear Weapon (Atomic Bomb): On August 6, 1945, during World War II (1939-45), an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The explosion immediately killed an estimated 80,000 people; tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure. Three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people. Japan’s Emperor Hirohito announced his country’s unconditional surrender in World War II in a radio address on August 15, citing the devastating power of “a new and most cruel bomb.”

 

 

WWII: World War II, the largest and deadliest conflict in human history, involved more than 50 nations and was fought on land, sea and air in nearly every part of the world. Also known as the Second World War, it was caused in part by the economic crisis of the Great Depression and by political tensions left unresolved following the end of World War I.

 

The war began when Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939 and raged across the globe until 1945, when Japan surrendered to the United States after atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By the end of World War II, an estimated 60 to 80 million people had died, including up to 55 million civilians, and numerous cities in Europe and Asia were reduced to rubble.

 

Among the people killed were 6 million Jews murdered in Nazi concentration camps as part of Hitler’s diabolical “Final Solution,” now known as the Holocaust. The legacy of the war included the creation of the United Nations as a peacekeeping force and geopolitical rivalries that resulted in the Cold War.

 

 

The Great Depression: The Great Depression was the worst economic crisis in modern history, lasting from 1929 until the beginning of World War II in 1939. The causes of the Great Depression included slowing consumer demand, mounting consumer debt, decreased industrial production and the rapid and reckless expansion of the U.S. stock market. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, it triggered a crisis in the international economy, which was linked via the gold standard. A rash of bank failures followed in 1930, and as the Dust Bowl increased the number of farm foreclosures, unemployment topped 20 percent by 1933. Presidents Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to stimulate the economy with a range of incentives including Roosevelt’s New Deal programs, but ultimately it took the manufacturing production increases of World War II to end the Great Depression.

 

 

WWI: World War I, which lasted from 1914 until 1918, introduced the world to the horrors of trench warfare and lethal new technologies such as poison gas and tanks. The result was some of the most horrific carnage the world had ever seen, with more than 16 million military personnel and civilians losing their lives.

 

It also radically altered the map, leading to the collapse of the sprawling Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian empires that had existed for centuries, and the formation of new nations to take their place. Long after the last shot had been fired, the political turmoil and social upheaval continued, and ultimately led to another, even bigger and bloodier global conflict two decades later.

 

The event that sparked the conflagration was the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, in 1914. But historians say that World War I actually was the culmination of a long series of events, stretching back to the late 1800s. The path to war included plenty of miscalculations and actions that turned out to have unforeseen consequences.

 

 

Imperialism and WWI: World War I wasn’t just a conflict between nations—it was a war between empires. Western European empires like Great Britain and France had overseas colonies around the world, while eastern empires like Austria-Hungary and Russia ruled European and North Asian territories connected by land. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on July 28, 1914, was itself an anti-imperialist murder, planned by members of Young Bosnia angry over Austria-Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

 

European competition for imperial territories helped set the stage for the rivalries that played out during the First World War, and the war in turn had a major effect on the balance of imperial power. The Russian, German, Austria-Hungarian and Ottoman empires all collapsed during or shortly after the war, which ended with a treaty that ceded Germany’s overseas colonies to the victors.

 

 

Slavery in the United States: Millions of enslaved Africans contributed to the establishment of colonies in the Americas and continued laboring in various regions of the Americas after their independence, including the United States. Many consider a significant starting point to slavery in America to be 1619, when the privateer The White Lion brought 20 enslaved Africans ashore in the British colony of Jamestown, Virginia. The crew had seized the Africans from the Portuguese slave ship São João Bautista. Yet, enslaved Africans had been present in regions such as Florida, that are part of present-day United States nearly one century before.

 

Throughout the 17th century, European settlers in North America turned to enslaved Africans as a cheaper, more plentiful labor source than Indigenous populations and indentured servants, who were mostly poor Europeans.

 

Existing estimates establish that Europeans and American slave traders transported nearly 12.5 million enslaved Africans to the Americas. Of this number approximately 10.7 million disembarked alive in the Americas. During the 18th century alone, approximately 6.5 million enslaved persons were transported to the Americas. This forced migration deprived the African continent of some of its healthiest and ablest men and women.

 

In the 17th and 18th centuries, enslaved Africans worked mainly on the tobacco, rice and indigo plantations of the southern Atlantic coast, from the Chesapeake Bay colonies of Maryland and Virginia south to Georgia.

 

 

French Revolution: The French Revolution was a watershed event in world history that began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s with the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte. During this period, French citizens radically altered their political landscape, uprooting centuries-old institutions such as the monarchy and the feudal system. The upheaval was caused by disgust with the French aristocracy and the economic policies of King Louis XVI, who met his death by guillotine, as did his wife Marie Antoinette. Though it degenerated into a bloodbath during the Reign of Terror, the French Revolution helped to shape modern democracies by showing the power inherent in the will of the people.

 

 

Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution was a period of scientific and technological development in the 18th century that transformed largely rural, agrarian societies—especially in Europe and North America—into industrialized, urban ones. Goods that had once been painstakingly crafted by hand started to be produced in mass quantities by machines in factories, thanks to the introduction of new machines and techniques in textiles, iron making and other industries.

 

 

Enlightenment Period

European politics, philosophy, science and communications were radically reoriented during the course of the “long 18th century” (1685-1815) as part of a movement referred to by its participants as the Age of Reason, or simply the Enlightenment. Enlightenment thinkers in Britain, in France and throughout Europe questioned traditional authority and embraced the notion that humanity could be improved through rational change. 

 

The Enlightenment produced numerous books, essays, inventions, scientific discoveries, laws, wars and revolutions. The American and French Revolutions were directly inspired by Enlightenment ideals and respectively marked the peak of its influence and the beginning of its decline. The Enlightenment ultimately gave way to 19th-century Romanticism.

 

 

Renaissance: The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Ages. Generally described as taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century, the Renaissance promoted the rediscovery of classical philosophy, literature and art. Some of the greatest thinkers, authors, statesmen, scientists and artists in human history thrived during this era, while global exploration opened up new lands and cultures to European commerce. The Renaissance is credited with bridging the gap between the Middle Ages and modern-day civilization.

 

 

Early Human Civilizations: While modern civilizations extend to every continent except Antarctica, most scholars place the earliest cradles of civilizations—in other words, where civilizations first emerged—in modern-day Iraq, Egypt, India, China, Peru and Mexico, beginning between approximately 4000 and 3000 B.C.

 

These ancient complex societies, starting with Mesopotamia, formed cultural and technological advances, several of which are still present today. “A great many of the details of modern life, not just in the Middle East and the West, but across the world, have origins that go back for thousands of years to the ancient cultures in their respective regions,” says Amanda Podany, author and professor emeritus of history at California State Polytechnic University.

 

 

Sample Response

ThesisTo lean the very recent history, the period of the early 21st century, shows us the structural change of the world since the Industrial Revolution as well as the insight of the humanity, both of which give us a guiding principle for the future.

Supporting DetailsThere are two main structural transitions. One is a shift of hegemony. 500 years of rein of Global North over Global South has started to collapse as their former colonies gained power and allied in groups such as BRICS. Although the United States still dominates the world with its military forces larger than all the militaries on earth combined, its actual dominance is in eclipse, which advances every time it unjustifiably attacks other countries, capped by the moral and geopolitical failure of its attack on Iran in 2026. With this shift, world may have less armed conflicts in the future because, although BRICS countries may have human right issues domestically, they are less likely to solve diplomatic issues by force. Another significant shift in this century is growing awareness of gender and patriarchy. As a result of this change, female leaders in business and politics have increased around the world. Some countries have more women than men in their legislature. Even Japan, which ranks the lowest in gender-equality, has got a ward council in its capitol Tokyo headed by a progressive female with female council members accounting for half of the seats. These entities benefit their members more than those with traditionally male-dominated administrations. (242 words)

 

2026年8月4日火曜日

TOEFL iBT Wriging for an Academic Discussion Will more people travel abroad after the pandemic? (Revised)

In recent years, it has become easier to travel abroad due to advancements in technology and transportation. However, the number of people traveling internationally has not fully recovered since the pandemic. Do you think more people will be willing to travel abroad in the future or not? Discuss the potential reasons for your opinion, considering factors such as technology, economic conditions, and social trends.

 

 

 

Lets think

1.       Are more people traveling now than before the pandemic as of 2026?

2.       What are the factors that can increase or decrease the number of international travelers?

 

 

Hints for Points

Note: International tourism has exceeded pre-pandemic level in terms of in-bound arrivals.

 

Factors to encourage traveling

1.       Technology: easier arrangements for traveling such as online booking for airline tickets and accommodation, translation apps, social media information, new medicine, etc.

2.       Economic conditions: economic growth, lower currency rates, promotion of tourism, etc.

3.       Social trends: globalization, viral videos, cultural exchange programs, etc.

 

Factors to discourage traveling

1.        Technology: spread of virous, increase of carbon footprints, etc.

2.        Economic conditions: widening wealth gap discouraging people from traveling a long distance

3.        Social trends: xenophobia, nationalism, etc.

 

 

Sample Answer for ideas and expressions

ThesisIgnorance is bliss, and we are forgetful when it comes to epidemics especially when fun and adventure are involved. Therefore, I think Alice is right. People will promote international traveling, expecting its positive impacts on economy and social trends. However, I am concerned about promoting more robust international traveling without proper containment of COVID-19, which has taken lives and devastated businesses. The speed of the infection and reality of politics must be taken into account.

Supporting DetailsThe pandemic of COVID-19 started in China at the end of 2019. The next month, a luxury cruise ship named Diamond Princess was found to be carrying infected passengers and was kept off the coast of Yokohama, Japan, without proper treatment. In a couple of months, the virus was rampant around the world. It has killed over 7.1 million as of 2026.

Counterargument-treatmentIt is true that airport quarantine and proper government countermeasures ought to prevent the spread of virus, but the fact is that we are living the 7th year of the pandemic. Not all governments can make proper moves based on science for the public good.[ns1]  In Japan, government officials didn’t notice the airborne nature of the coronavirus even after the release of the related article of The Lancet, and after they noticed the truth, they have covered up their mistake by not providing PCR tests. Once vaccine was available, it degraded Covid on the list of infectious diseases down to the level of influenza, lifted mask-mandate, raised the price of the drugs, putting the real situation of the disaster under carpet. In the U.S.A, Trump pretended not to know the virus is airborne, with the idea of applying social Darwinism to pandemic to eliminate those who were socially vulnerable. US under Biden and some other countries contained the virus well for a while, but soon they started getting variants from other countries. As long as the world is connected by advanced transportation, without measures based on successful models, which won’t be taken, the next pandemic is on its way. Meanwhile, health is precious enough to give up the short-term benefits and profits.

ConclusionAs many governments are getting in the hands of those who lack scientific reasoning and compassion, and as development keeps invading animal habitats, increasing the risk of human contacts with unknown viruses, not to speak of new variants of coronavirus, it is not a good idea to keep the human flow free. If the world majority start thinking that less vibrant social activities are better than deaths and lockdown, international traveling will not be on top of their wish list in the future. (433 words)

 


 [ns1]

TOEFL iBT Writing for an Academic Discussion Mandatory Voting (Revised)

In recent years, voter turnout has been declining in many democracies around the world. This trend has led to growing concerns about the legitimacy of elected governments and the health of democratic systems. One proposed solution is to make voting compulsory, as is the case in some countries. Should voting be made compulsory? Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of mandatory voting, considering its impact on democracy, civic engagement, and representation.

 

 

 

Let’s Read

Read the following excerpt from an article of Harvard International Review, underlined by yours truly Sasaki, and think about why mandatory voting is recommended and what problems can be expected.

 

Compulsion Emboldens Democracy: A Deep-dive into Australia’s Mandatory Voting  12/10/2023

Expanding to Democracies Around the World

As a direct comparison to the turnout at past Australian referendums, the United Kingdom’s referendum to leave the European Union only had a 72.2 percent voter turnout. The lack of voter turnout appears to plague many of the most prominent countries in the world. In India, 67.4 percent of eligible voters voted in the 2019 election. In the United States, 66.8 percent of eligible voters went to the booths in the 2020 election. To further prove the lack of voter turnout, Canada had a 62.6 percent turnout in the 2021 elections. Democratic governments are founded upon the people’s voice, but when nearly a third of the population is left out of the consideration in a country, it is hard to call the country democratic.

 

Australia’s model, which will be on display in the upcoming referendum, could possibly serve as a mechanism by which to increase participation across the world; however, transposing the Australian voting system to democratic systems across the world requires a conversation within the respective countries among its citizens and the government on the way in which it is implemented.

 

A common argument made against accessible elections is the possibility of voter fraud and the reduction in democratic security; the potential trade-off requires a consideration about the different mechanisms that should be implemented to achieve both simultaneously instead of having to comprise one. In Australia, voter fraud was found to be fairly low because of the methods they have instituted behind the scenes to confirm votes and to reduce the likelihood of fraud including digital cross-referencing. On the surface, voting is largely accessible, but the intensive review process provides security on the back-end: accessibility and security do not have to be mutually exclusive.

 

The benefits of compulsory voting does not mean the implementation can be completely uniform. Voters in every country often go through personal struggles that limit their ability to vote, do not agree with any of the candidates running for election, which might necessitate the need for blank ballots to be an option for citizens as a sign of protest, or simply cannot afford the punishments that would ensue if they are unable to vote. So while the system is rigid, it ought to be fluid enough for people to avoid being trapped: they cannot vote, and when they do not, they cannot afford the punishment. The ultimate goal of compulsory voting is to maximize the amount of people interested in the voting process—not contribute to people loathing it because of the punishments they face.

 

When implementing a voting system, countries have to seriously consider the difficulties citizens face when attempting to vote in their country. Who are those citizens? The people who work on weekends because they do not make enough for a two-day break might require a national holiday; the people who live in areas that do not have polling stations nearby; the people who need access to public transportation to reach the booths; the people who are simply disinterested in the democratic process because of a lack of political education, or even the people who are unaware about voter registration. Implementing drastic policy change requires intensive policy analysis to ensure people do not get left out of consideration.

 

In the end, regardless of the voting model adopted by countries across the world, the bottom line is clear: the means for people to vote in an election are crucial for higher voting rates.

 

 

Lets Think

1.        What are the voting rates in Japan?

2.        When you turn the voting age, would you like to go to the poll station to vote? Why/Why not?

 

 

Hints for Points

True democracy 

1.       Low voting rates will lead to tyranny because it is a sign that people are not watching those in power. (Japan)

2.       Forced voting is not a form of true democracy, which is “a government of the people by the people for the people” - Abraham Lincoln.

3.       Civics classes must be a required subject before making voting required to increase voluntary voters.

 

Civic engagement

1.        “Just because you don’t take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you.” - Pericles

2.        People who are poor, who will most benefit from political reforms, are the least to vote (‘Voting is not on their radar': lowest turnout predicted in poorest areas – The Guardian). Mandatory voting will give them a chance that they will appreciate in the end.

3.        Other means for higher turnout such as a referendum on daily issues that accompanies the election would be more effective. (State of Michigan, the U.S.A.)

 

Representation

1.        The change of demography of the U.S.A. makes more progressive candidates elected. The current majority of America are either non-whites, women, or the young, in other words, the anti-Trump demography.  

2.        Poorly informed, uneducated citizens will vote for a wrong candidate or agenda. (Japan)

3.        Good candidates will mobilize voters. (Obama and Bernie)

 

 

Sample Answer

ThesisI don’t really agree with mandatory voting. Though Eliza’s logic that higher voting rates reflect the will of the public may apply to a working democracy, the real world won’t work that way, where people are not properly informed and are discouraged from choosing the best candidate for them. In the worst-case scenario, it could be a good tool for tyrants. Russia and North Korea celebrate their extremely high voting rates of their presidential elections.

Supporting DetailsProviding correct information and proper civics education, including information about current political climate and candidates to promote voluntary voter participation is necessary as Tim says. If there is a referendum on mandatory voting, probably the bill won’t pass, as no one likes to be controlled. Rather, accessing needs and interests of the constituents and connecting them to politics by getting them to realize that everything in their lives is related to politics will lead to active civic engagement, which will realize good representation and true democracy. The current Mayor of New York Zohran Mandan get elected by listening to the people in the street every day, and he has been praised for his good government since he took office.

Counterargument-treatmentIn an ideally democratic world, voters would be well-informed through the media that check candidates’ legitimacy, political visions, and specific strategies; good election campaign like accessible townhall meetings and direct contact with the candidates; active union movements; and individual citizens’ actions. But actually, the corporate media report either little or false information about candidates, and as a result, people’s interests are focused not on election but on daily matters. In this circumstance, compulsory voting may have an inverse effect on civic engagement. Active pursuers of their best choice, or least horrible choice, are exceptions. Most people will either vote for those who are said to win or resort to a blank voting, which works as either an abstention or a ballot for the incumbent, and so it’s bad for democracy because it contributes to, for example, a reelection of a corrupt incumbent by reducing the votes for the challenger who can correct the corruption.

ConclusionTherefore, compulsory voting does not seem to be a good cure for indifference to politics, or low civic engagement. (318 words)

 

 

Sample Answer Structure


Thesis

Supporting Details

Why the advantages/disadvantages don’t matter

Conclusion