Writing Topic
Suppose your country has an unexpected amount of money that can be
spent on either the military or your country’s Olympic athletes. Which should
your country spend money on, the military or Olympic sports? Offer specific
details to explain your choice.
☆Let’s think
1.
Why is the choice between
military and Olympic athletes? Why is it not between military and welfare, or
education?
List as many nouns for military and Olympics as you
can to compare and contrast the choices.
List of nouns
that relate to for military:
List of nouns
that relate to Olympics:
2.
What nouns in the lists do
military and Olympics share?
3.
What nouns in the lists do
military and Olympics not share?
4.
Which nouns in the lists do you
like?
5.
If the money were allotted to
either of the choices, what do you think would happen?
6.
Considering specific conditions
of your country, which choice would you make? Why?
☆Hints for Points
1.
Choice between military and
Olympic athletes is the choice between war and peace. Nouns that relate to
military are battle, disaster-relief operations, nationalism, weapons,
industry, soldiers, deaths, injuries, and destructions. On the other hand,
nouns that represent Olympics are games and matches, fair play, national pride,
excitement, admiration, exercise, industry, economic effect and encouragement
for people in disaster-stricken areas. Olympics have more good connotations
than military.
2.
There has been increase in the
threat of neighboring countries. ⇔ counterargument:
Japan-U.S. relationship does not seem to change soon (Japanese prime ministers
and U.S. presidents reaffirming Japan-U.S. security relationship) Also, practically,
there is no defending the country perfectly as too many countries have too many
weapons.
3.
Request for militarization from
powers have been strong. The Unites States and other big countries request
Japanese militaristic participation in their activities to fight against
terrorism or protect commercial ships against pirates. ⇔ counterargument: Japan has had defense-only policy. SDF activity is
limited to peaceful operations under Article Nine in our constitution, which
stipulates renunciation of war and military force. Also, joining the
militaristic activity is joining the oppression of the oppressed that resort to
violence.
4.
Buying weapons is taken as
flexing your muscle to those who want to start a battle with us.
5.
Japan has a history of violent
past: imperial Japan before and during WWII. Militarization would give a bad
impression to other countries, especially countries that Japan invaded in the
past.
6.
Japan has a history of
diplomatic solutions of international problems since the end of WWII. This has
earned us a good reputation and has kept it free from terrorism.
7.
In terms of the money flow in
the economy, the choice is letting the money flow into either the military
industrial complex (American arms industry, Japanese heavy industry, businesses
that cater to the Self-Defense Force and American bases) or Olympics-related
industries (construction, sports, food and drink, etc.)
8.
The world is shifting from arms
competition to business cooperation, and Japan is one of the biggest economies
in the world; hence chances are low that Japan wages wars with other nations
and arms race is futile.
9.
Military is now necessary for
humanitarian aids to disaster stricken areas. As long as it is used for
peaceful purposes, providing extra money to the military is good.
10. Government spending on sports has been tight because of huge
national debts, sluggish economy, and repeating disasters.
11. Good images (soft power) will be provided by supporting Olympic
sports.
12. People will be happy if athletes from their country do well in the
Olympics. On the other hand, it is too difficult for them to understand how the
money is used in the military.
13. Weapons are much more expensive than promotion of sports. Therefore,
it is more effective to allocate money to Olympic athletes than to military.
Reference
Excerpt from An Appeal from the “Article Nine Association”
Through the use of weapons reaching the cruelty of the
atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Second World War claimed over fifty
million lives. As a result, the citizens of the world learned the lesson that
resorting to force should never be an option, even for the purpose of resolving
international disputes.
Bearing an enormous responsibility for having continuously pursued a war of invasion, Japan decided to work towards realizing this global vision, and thus established a constitution including Article Nine which stipulated the renunciation of war and of military force.
Bearing an enormous responsibility for having continuously pursued a war of invasion, Japan decided to work towards realizing this global vision, and thus established a constitution including Article Nine which stipulated the renunciation of war and of military force.
…The use of force only results in robbing a country and its people
of their livelihood and of their happiness. Since the 1990s, armed
interventions by major nations into regional conflicts have also failed to
result in effective resolutions. That is why, in such places as Europe and
Southeast Asia, efforts are being strengthened to create regional frameworks
that can help to resolve conflicts through diplomacy and dialogue. …
Based on Article Nine, Japan needs to develop ties of friendship and
cooperation with the peoples of Asia and other regions, and change a diplomatic
stance that only prioritizes a military alliance with the United States. Japan
must play an active role in the tide of world history by exercising its
autonomy and acting in a pragmatic manner. It is precisely because of Article
Nine that Japan can engage its partner nations in peaceful diplomacy while
respecting their various positions, and collaborate with them in the fields of
economy, culture, science and technology.
ヒロシマ・ナガサキの原爆にいたる残虐な兵器によって、五千万を越える人命を奪った第二次世界大戦。この戦争から、世界の市民は、国際紛争の解決のためであっても、武力を使うことを選択肢にすべきではないという教訓を導きだしました。/ 侵略戦争をしつづけることで、この戦争に多大な責任を負った日本は、戦争放棄と戦力を持たないことを規定した九条を含む憲法を制定し、こうした世界の市民の意思を実現しようと決心しました。/ …なにより武力の行使は、その国と地域の民衆の生活と幸福を奪うことでしかありません。一九九〇年代以降の地域紛争への大国による軍事介入も、紛争の有効な解決にはつながりませんでした。だからこそ、東南アジアやヨーロッパ等では、紛争を、外交と話し合いによって解決するための、地域的枠組みを作る努力が強められています。/ … / 憲法九条に基づき、アジアをはじめとする諸国民との友好と協力関係を発展させ、アメリカとの軍事同盟だけを優先する外交を転換し、世界の歴史の流れに、自主性を発揮して現実的にかかわっていくことが求められています。憲法九条をもつこの国だからこそ、相手国の立場を尊重した、平和的外交と、経済、文化、科学技術などの面からの協力ができるのです。 (「九条の会」アピール一部抜粋)
☆Sample Essay Structure
【Introduction】Given two choices, spending extra money on either the military or
Olympic athletes, I would choose the latter.
【Point 1】Choosing Olympics sends a civil message to the public and the world.
【Point 2】The world is shifting towards business cooperations.
【Counterargument-treatment】It is true that threat of being attacked
exists, but the threat of rouge activity will never free us as there are many
kinds of people and countries on this planet, and after all, we live in the
world where thousands of nuclear weapons are in place targeting spots on the
other sides of the oceans at this moment. Some insane attack on us might be as
either likely or unlikely as some lapses of the controllers of those arms are.
【Conclusion】Instead of spending money for fear, I would like my government to
spend it on an activity that can create hope.
Other Patterns for Sample Essay Structure
Pattern A
Introduction
Body 1: Good point of my choice 1
Body 2: Good point of my choice 2
Body 3: Why the other choice is less important
Conclusion
Pattern B
Introduction
Body 1: About Olympics
Body 2: About military
Body 3: My C\choice
Conclusion
Your Sample Essay Structure
【Introduction】
【Point 1】
【Point 2】
【Point 3】
【Conclusion】
☆Speech Time
Make a one-minute speech on this topic.
☆Sample Paragraph development
【Main Idea】Choosing Olympics sends a civil message.
【Supporting Detail (general)】Spending extra
money on a certain budget sends an important message. Our country, though not
wealthy as before, is a developed country, and usage of some unexpected large
amount of money shows exactly what the government is interested in.
【Supporting Detail (specific)】 Whether
allocating extra money on military or Olympics can be taken as the sign of
being warlike or pacifistic. Given the international concern over Japanese
politics swinging to militaristic, it would be unwise to show any tendency to
favor its national force.
【Follow-up】The Olympic is not free from criticisms, but it is in the range of
who benefits the most while military spending always reminds wars and deaths.
【Wrap-up】Japan should send a peaceful message to the world by focusing on
civil activities.
Your Sample
Paragraph Development:
【Main Idea】
【Supporting
Detail (general)】
【Supporting
Detail (specific)】
【Follow-up】
【Conclusion】
Comments or Suggestion from
your partner or group members
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。