Question
What is one job that you
think won’t be replaced by robots in the future and why?
☆Let’s Think
Do research on the
following questions and discuss them with others.
1.
What is Janet’s point? Provide
a case in point.
2.
What is Thomas’s point? Provide
a case in point.
3.
What is your answer to this
question? Share your opinion.
☆Hints for Points
1.
Social worker
2.
Medical personnel
3.
Zoo attendant
4.
Musician, dancer, and artist
5.
Athlete
6.
Writer and movie director
7.
Manager and CEO
8.
Detective
9.
Researcher
☆Response for Ideas and Expressions
I believe the job of artists
won’t be replaced by AI. Fine art that AI produces, for instance, are just a
combination of existing information of works related to the given theme. For
example, AI would be able to copy works of Vincent van Gogh or produce works
that look like a van Gogh. However, they won’t be able to reproduce his anxiety
or longing in a new piece because an AI doesn’t have a suffering spirit that
van Gogh had. It has no spirit at all. Neither does it have a hand or eyes
wired to the brain where the suffering and joy of life occurs. For the same
reason, it won’t be able to make humans laugh with humor except for unintended
ones. It cannot have empathy or mercy, nor can it have dream or vision. It has
no concern, insight, or inspiration, either. It has no passion. It cannot love
even a puppy. Not a bit of mind shared by life exist in it. Thus, it cannot
make a masterpiece that truly impress us. Unless humans lose spirit, heart, or
mind, AI artists won’t be able to fool us. At best, it would be a tool for
inspiration whose random results we may find interest in. (209 words)
☆Response plan
Topic Sentence:
Supporting Details:
Conclusion:
DRAFT
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。