Writing Topic
Consider the following statement. The mass media (television,
magazines, newspapers, and so on) concentrate too much on the private lives of
famous people. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
☆Let’s think
1. What does the expression “too much” mean? When do we say it?
Note: We say, “Too much!”
when something is over the necessary or acceptable amount, when something is
violating some rule, or when something is giving us or someone else pain. |
2. Is the broadcasting time for
gossip too much?
3. How about the contents of the
celebrity news? Do they focus on things that should be left untouched?
4. Do you agree or disagree with
the statement of the writing topic? Why?
☆Hints for Points
Agree
1. Most celebrity reports can be regarded as
invasion of privacy.
2. Media attention provides places for
scapegoating, which is a bad custom.
3. Unnecessary reports to satisfy curiosities
of audience and readers are made for profits.
Disagree
1. Gossip accounts for only a small part of
the whole media coverage of current issues.
2. Freedom of the press should be protected by
any means. It provides important information that we should know which is often
hidden from the public.
☆Essays for Ideas and Expressions
Essay 1 Writing for TOEFL iBT, Barrons # 28
Essay 2
When we say something is too much, we mean it
crosses some line or it is doing harm, or both. Celebrity journalism makes
illegal reports and makes celebrities suffer. In competition for higher
ratings, its coverage will go over the top. Therefore, I agree with the
statement that the mass media concentrate too much on the private lives of
famous people.
Most celebrity reports are illegal. While freedom
of press is strongly protected, a person’s privacy is
also protected by law unless hiding it is seriously against public interests.
Then publicizing a famous person’s private information
that has nothing to do with public interests is illegal. Just like ordinary
people, celebrities have no obligation to make their whole lives open to
public. The reason why so few law suits are made is that there are too many
cases and each case is too small, though not trivial, to file.
In addition, innocent individuals suffer because
of celebrity journalism. Many famous people have had their lives irreversibly
affected by media reports for which they were not accountable to the public.
Some became mentally or physically ill, others died. It is clear that media
coverage about famous people has gone too far. Some gossipers might quip that
transparent private life is the price for being famous. However, the argument
is not convincing enough. The fact that Queen Elizabeth’s face without make-up will never be in print shows that not all
famous people have to show every aspect of their lives. On the other hand, paparazzi
have no qualms about taking any kind of private pictures of pop stars. When you
make some people, especially those you consider “weaker” or “lower” than
you, feel pain while you do not do the same to others, the action is called
bullying. Gossiping can be a kind of bullying under the guise of attention.
Mass media, except for independent media, are
destined to focus too much on unnecessary topics. Like other profit-making
entities, media pursue profits, in other words, higher ratings or circulation,
and for that purpose they will do anything to attract attention. Also, like
other companies, they produce demand. Just as other companies try to sell
unnecessary things like potato chips with a new flavor, mass media try to sell
insignificant information, gossip, of which we weak humans cannot stop taking a
bite. They advertise gossip with sound bites and sensational pictures, while
playing down serious matters related to their sponsors. It is true that, to be
precise, there is nothing that does not matter at all in this world, but lines
should be drawn.
Because most media attention on famous people is
against the law; it is doing harm to innocent individuals; and it is the
reflection of unscrupulous economic activities, it can be said that mass media
concentrate too much on the private lives of celebrities. Common sense is
necessary in the celebrity journalism.
☆Making the structure of your essay
The following is the structure of Essay B, the essay above.
Introduction
Thesis: I agree with the
statement that the mass media concentrate too much on the private lives of
famous people. |
Body 1
Reason 1: illegal;
invasion of privacy e.g. coverage unrelated to
the person’s job, beyond the bounds of decency |
Body 2
Reason 2: doing harm to innocent people e.g. celebrities who
became mentally or physically ill or died, a bullying |
Body 3
Reason 3: providing
unnecessary information e.g. pursuing higher
ratings, producing demands for unnecessary information |
Conclusion
Conclusion: It can be said
that mass media concentrate too much on the private lives of celebrities. |
Your Essay Structure.
Introduction
Thesis: I agree/disagree with the statement that the mass media
concentrate too much on the private lives of famous people. |
Body 1
Reason 1: e.g. |
Body 2
Reason 2: e.g. |
Body 3
Reason 3: e.g. |
Conclusion
Conclusion: It can(not) be said that mass media concentrate too
much on the private lives of celebrities. |
Notes 1) What you write in the introduction and the conclusion are
the same but usually worded differently. Supporting details of each reason are
provided in each paragraph of the body. 2) When you take the iBT
writing test, writing a simple conclusion sentence before starting to write the
whole essay would be a good idea so that you can avoid finishing the essay
without Conclusion because of the time limit.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。