Writing Topic
Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. It is more
worthwhile for a university to spend money on improving facilities than on
hiring high-quality professors.
☆Let’s Think
1. What are the merits of spending money on
facilities?
2. University facilities include those not
only for studies but also for students such as dormitories, gyms, and cafeteria.
They may need to have features that many people are attracted to.
3. What are the merits of spending money on
high-level professors?
4. For what purpose does the university exist?
Why do people go to university?
5. What does the word “worthwhile” mean? The
statement uses the word “worthwhile” not “important”. Does it mean that even
though high-quality professors are important, improving facilities is more
worthwhile?
6. Is spending money on facilities more worthwhile
than on high-quality professors in realizing the answers to Question 4? Let’s
think about the relation between research facilities and faculty (professors) in
studies by analogy. Professors can be to facilities what the software is to the
hardware of a system. Just as good software performs exquisitely even the
hardware looks miserable as long as its specifications are above some level, so
do good professors achieve good results even if facilities for their studies are
not perfect. At the same time, if the hardware is old and worn out, of course,
nothing can make it do even a basic task.
☆Hints for Points
Agree
1. Facilities determines the research results
in some areas.
2. Most students do not care if their
professors are not the best as long as they are good enough to teach them. Rather,
they prefer to have the best environment for college life.
Disagree
1. Good research and teaching cannot be done
without a good brain.
2. High-quality professors will make the
university famous.
☆Essay for Ideas and Expressions
Both facilities and professors are necessary
for a university. However, if the statement that it is more worthwhile for a
university to spend money on improving facilities than on hiring high-quality
professors is based on the idea that university is a business and thus its
purpose is to make profits, I cannot agree with it because in my understanding university
exists to promote and protect studies.
Spending more money on facilities than on
hiring good professors is putting the cart before the horse. While university
should provide a good environment so that professors can do research without
worrying about funding for their studies, good facilities cannot be utilized
without good researchers. For example, abundant information that sophisticated
machines can provide is useless without a person who knows how to use machines
and how to interpret information they produce. Also, many professors are not
only top level researchers but also very good teachers. They are some of the
best, or at least most interesting, minds students meet in their whole lives:
human beings with amazing brains and often unforgettable personalities. It is
professors that protect, improve, and increase the knowledge the university has
and raise the next generation of researchers and well-educated citizens that
support important studies.
On the other hand, in the perspective of
university as a business, spending money on the facilities might also be
crucial. Universities need to attract as many students, their customers, as
possible. Students who are purely interested in the subject they are going to
major in and choose a university with renowned professors in the field of their
interest might be minorities. A larger percentage of the young may want to
pursue a good quality of life rather than an academic success and would be more
concerned about the level of facilities related to their college life than
those of professors. For example, students who are to live away from home might
take good dormitory facilities into consideration in choosing a university.
Students who enjoy sports would choose the university with good sporting
facilities.
However, the main purpose of a university
is research and education. Talks about making money should be the last of its priority.
Although reality may put pressure on allocating more of its budget to other
things than hiring high-quality professors, if it gives in, it is not really
entitled to be called higher education. Instead of trying to attract many
students or trying to increase its capital, the university should spend money on
protecting its faculty.
The university is a place for studies and
studies depend on high-level professors. Therefore, it is not worthwhile for a
university to spend more money on its facilities than on its faculty. Good
professors are more important for a university than anything else, including
making a short term profit.
☆Sample Essay Structures
Sample Essay Structure 1
【Main Idea】 I agree/disagree with the statement that … because ….
【Facility】It is worthwhile for a university to spend
money on facilities in that ….
【Professors】It is worthwhile for a university to spend
money on professors because ….
【Decisive Reason】A university should spend more money on
facilities/professors because ….
【Conclusion】Because…, I think it is more worthwhile …..
Sample Essay Structure 2
【Main Idea】 I agree/disagree with the statement that … .The
reasons are as follows.
【Reason to agree/disagree 1】First, ….
【Reason to agree/disagree 2】Second, ….
【Why the drawbacks do not matter】It is true that …, but ….
【Conclusion】Since…, I cannot disagree/agree with the idea
that ….
Your Essay Structure
【Main Idea】
【Point 1】
【Point 2】
【Point 3】
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。