Are major discoveries more often the result of
collaborative efforts or individual genius??
☆Let’s Think
1
What is the
difference between discovery and invention?
Note: While inventions are creations of
something new,
discoveries are findings of
something that had existed all the time.
2
Name
examples of major discoveries. Are they results of collaborative efforts or
individual genius? Why?
☆Hints for Points
Collective efforts
1.
These days, novel prizes of science are shared by a group of
scientists. Very
often, major discoveries occur as a serendipity to a member of a group of
researchers who are doing the same researches.
2.
Today’s important
discoveries are products of strenuous efforts financed by those in power. Governments and big
businesses support scientific projects for profits and power.
Atomic energy, DNA, semi-conductors workable at room temperatures, iPS cells, Higgs
boson, and gravitational waves are all crucial scientific discoveries that were
made systematically with huge subsidies and through the collaboration of a
large number of people in the related fields after some geniuses constructed
the theories.
3.
No genius can discover anything
without cumulative knowledge as an asset of humanity. Galileo’s discovery was
based on the theory of Copernicus, and Copernicus’s theory was impossible
without observations by unknown ancient thinkers.
Individual
genius
1.
Historically, major breakthroughs
have been attributed to individual researchers, who were often ridiculed by the
neighbors who didn’t understand what they were doing.
2.
Chance discoveries would have
been overlooked had it not been for a genius. Numerous
people had seen the same phenomenon as Newton saw, but no one else discovered
gravity. Only Flaming had the insight to find penicillin when he saw common
molds in his laboratory. Few people still understand Einstein’s Theory of
Relativity. He solely came up with the idea although helped by a mathematician
in calculation.
☆Sample Response
Structures
【Thesis】As long as a mind is a product of knowledge accumulated by
a group of people or all humans, major discoveries are results of collaborative
efforts rather than a genius in a broader sense of meaning.
【Supporting Details】First of all, thoughts
are in sync with language, and the language the thinker uses has been made by
the people of the individual’s ethnicity. Also, the pieces of knowledge the
individual puts together to reach the “Eureka!” moment are the results of the
efforts of other individuals.
【Counterargument-treatment】Of
course, it is genius that leaps to the insight that leads to the final stage of
a discovery, but what makes the genius is not just the genius themselves.
【Conclusion】Thus, major discoveries are made by countless number of
people. (128 words)
【Thesis】People intuitively
regard major discoveries as products of prodigy, and they are right.
【Supporting Details】Breakthroughs need unconventional ideas from extraordinary
minds. Historic major discoveries are attributed to such names as Galileo
Galilei, Issac Newton, and Albert Einstein, who were actually unknown and even
treated as failures or touched when they were vigorously working on what was later
going to be a discovery of the century.
【Counterargument-treatment & Conclusion】Putting aside the cumulative knowledge that
the breakthroughs were based on, significant discoveries are made by the gifted
that their contemporaries never took them seriously, and therefore a major
breakthrough is achieved not by a group of people but by a solitary giant. (106 words)
Write
your draft on this topic. Give feedback to other people’s drafts, asking
questions and making suggestions.
DRAFT
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。