2026年6月1日月曜日

TOEFL iBT Writing for an Academic Discussion Should physical exercise be a mandatory part of education? (Revised)

Do you believe that physical exercise should be a mandatory part of the school education, or should schools concentrate solely on academic subjects?

 

 

Let’s Think

1.     What is the purpose of education?

2.     Is physical exercise a required activity in your school? Why do you think it is or why not?

3.     Are there any other benefits in making physical exercise mandatory than what Alice mentioned?

4.     What is Bob’s point? Do you agree?

 

 

Hints for points

The purpose of education

To promote physical, mental, and social development of individuals.    

To develop every individual to their full potential.

To equip individuals with earning ability.

 

The purposes and benefits of physical education

Healthy mind and body: Moderate exercise can not only promote physical fitness and develop motor skills but also help students better concentrate on their study.

Healthy lifestyle: Students who are not interested in sports can learn to stay in shape and maintain a healthy lifestyle into adulthood.

Familiarity with popular sports: Hands-on experiences with popular sports help students enjoy playing or watching them.

Intimacy with classmates and social skills: Playing sports or doing exercise together helps students relate to each other and develop social skills.

 

Counterargument

Physical exercise is available outside of school while academic subjects are not, so time should be spent on the latter and the former should be an elective.

 

 

Sample Responses

Sample 1

ThesisI think P.E. should be mandatory because it fulfills the purpose of education: to promote physical, mental, and social development of individuals.

Supporting DetailsFor example, playing basketball develops physical fitness, heightens alertness, and promotes friendship and team work. P.E. also allows students to relax as Alice mentions. I’m sure everybody remembers the refreshed feeling after moving their body in a P.E. class between academic classes. Studies find that exercise even raises learning ability and memory.

Counterargument-treatmentAlthough I understand Bob’s concern about losing precious time for academic studies by allocating not a few school hours for workout and sports, but it could be a little narrow-sighted in light of the purpose of education. It is not just academic performance but also well-rounded personality and physical fitness that make one’s life fulfilling, which is what education is all about.

ConclusionThus, I believe P.E. should be a requirement. (144 words)

 

Sample 2

ThesisI agree with Bob because academic subjects are available only in school while physical exercise can be done anywhere.

Supporting DetailsAwareness of physical fitness has become prevalent, and there are enough opportunities to exercise outside of school, affordable means and facilities for health being available. Also, it is questionable if sports are indispensable for the health. Doing household work or walking a long distance, for example, has the same positive effects on the body and mind.

Counterargument-treatmentOf course, benefit from physical exercise at school cannot be denied. However, it won’t get a unanimous support as some people don’t like sports or doing exercise. Actually, P.E. classes mean nothing but a torture to them. Those who have to observe P.E. classes due to frailty, injury, or disease even have to endure the feeling of seclusion. In the end, physical exercise is one of the practical subjects like music and art, which are elective in high school.

ConclusionTherefore, I think physical exercise should be treated as such at least in high school.

 (169 words)


Write your response in 10 minutes. Show each other your responses. Write down questions or suggestions to each other’s response.


 

                                                   DRAFT