Academic Discussion and Writing Are major discoveries more often the result of collaborative efforts or individual genius?

Question: Are major discoveries more often the result of collaborative efforts or individual genius?? 

 

 

☆Let’s Think

1         What is the difference between discovery and invention?

2         Name examples of major discoveries. Are they results of collaborative efforts or individual genius? Why?

 

 

☆Hints for Points

Collective efforts

1.     These days, novel prizes of science are shared by a group of scientists.

2.     Very often, major discoveries occur as a serendipity to a member of a group of researchers who are doing the same researches.

3.     Today’s important discoveries are products of strenuous efforts financed by those in power. Governments and big businesses support projects that would yield significant findings. Atomic energy, DNA, semi-conductors workable at room temperatures, and iPS cells, Higgs boson, and gravitational waves are all crucial scientific discoveries that were made systematically with huge subsidies and through the collaboration of a large number of people in the related fields after some geniuses constructed the theories.

4.     No genius can discover anything without cumulative knowledge as an asset of humanity. Galileo’s discovery was based on the theory of Copernicus, and Copernicus’s theory was based on his predecessors.

 

Individual genius

1.     Historically, major discoveries have been attributed to individuals.

2.     Chance discoveries would have been overlooked had it not been for a genius. Numerous people had seen the same phenomenon as Newton saw, but no one else discovered gravity. Only Flaming had the insight to find penicillin when he saw common molds in his laboratory. Few people still understand Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. He solely came up with the idea although helped by a mathematician in calculation.

 

 

☆Sample Essay Structure

A        【Thesis】As long as a mind is a product of knowledge accumulated by a group of people or all humans, major discoveries are results of collaborative efforts rather than a genius in a broader sense of meaning.

【Supporting Details】First of all, thoughts are in sync with language, and the language the thinker uses has been made by the people of the individual’s ethnicity. Also, the pieces of knowledge the individual puts together to reach the “Eureka!” moment are the results of the efforts of other individuals.

【Counterargument-treatment】Of course, it is genius that leaps to the insight that leads to the final stage of a discovery, but what makes the genius is not just the genius themselves.

【Conclusion】Thus, major discoveries are made by countless number of people. (124 words)

 

B        【Thesis】People intuitively regard major discoveries as products of prodigy and I think they are right.

【Supporting Details】Historic major discoveries are attributed to such names as Galileo Galilei, Issac Newton, and Albert Einstein. Those people were actually unknown and even treated as failures or touched when they were vigorously working on what was later going to be a discovery of the century.  

【Counterargument-treatment】Putting aside the cumulative knowledge that the breakthroughs were based on, significant discoveries are solely made by the gifted that people of their times never understood, and few contemporary scientists of these geniuses understood and collaborated with their jobs.

【Conclusion】Therefore, major breakthroughs are done by individual genius, not by collective efforts. (110 words)

 

 

Write your response in 10 minutes. Show each other your responses. Write down questions or suggestions to each other’s response.

 

                                               DRAFT