☆Let’s Think
1)
If you were a parent, would you
send your child to a public school or a private school? Why
2)
In Japan, the board of education
work for the purpose. For example, they choose textbooks, change school rules,
and dismiss teachers. However, the members are not elected from parents or
community members. In the U.S., the board of education and, in the U.K., the
school governing body consist of parents, community members, and students. Which
do you think is better? Why?
☆Hints
for Points
Agree
1.
The concept of children as the
asset of the community will be revived and this will lead to more involved
citizens’ actions to require better childcare from the government and stimulate
awareness in citizens’ power in the government.
2.
Parents are the most serious
about providing quality education to their children. e.g. Governments often cut budgets for
education.
3.
The community, rather than the
government, often know what should be taught at school, so their voices should
be reflected more in education.
e.g. About 100 years ago, in
Taisho era, merchants of the city of Osaka felt the need of language skills in the
international trade and funded to make a language school for young merchants.
The government nationalized the school after WWII, naming it Osaka University
of Foreign Studies.
4.
Mind development will be
accelerated. e.g. Some communities have started
support systems for learning by retiree volunteers and has improved
performances of children at school.
Disagree
1.
Leaving education to specialists
is the best policy. The government has the department of education and trains
qualified professionals to provide a good education. Voting is the channel to
reflect citizens’ opinions.
2.
Influential entities such as strong
men or religious organizations can prevent proper education.
e.g. There are people who are
against girls’ education because of their belief.
☆Sample Essay Structure
A
【Thesis】I am totally for the active role of parents and communities in
school education in terms of mind development.
【Supporting Details】Exposure to various individuals in the community will stimulate
awareness and cognition. 《Example》For example, after-school schooling volunteers provide children with
knowledge and experiences crucial to mind development. They teach them morals, pass
them down community history, culture, and tradition, or tell them wise perspectives
that are not taught at school. They can also give children a sense of security through
the interactions. 《Follow-up》Although school curriculum includes mind development, the good old
way of nurturing is often more effective.
【Counterargument-treatment】It is true that too many cooks can spoil the
broth as the saying goes, but it is the golden rule of a good society that
youngsters are taken care of by the adults around them to raise the next
generation for the continuation of the community.
【Conclusion】Therefore, communal involvement is vital in education. (152 words)
B
【Introduction】With caveats, I think parents and communities
should play an active role in improving the quality of education.
【Benefits】Citizen’s involvement makes reforms appropriate, easier, and faster.
Financial aid from the community for education can increase. Also, adults can
learn more about child-rearing.
【Caveat 1】On the other hand, ideology can overwhelm reality and may make the
school system can be disrupted such as children being forced to follow
unnecessary rules.
【Caveat 2】Also, the power structure among parents or in the community may
undermine the education, leading to greater inequality.
【Conclusion】Active participation of the adults in education is fundamentally
good, but unless it is decided to what extent parents and communities are
involved in education, adverse effects may follow. (107 words)
Write your response in 10 minutes. Show each other your responses.
Write down questions or suggestions to each other’s response.
DRAFT
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。