The necessity of teaching creativity in schools is a topic of considerable debate, especially in our rapidly evolving world. Some argue that fostering creativity is essential for preparing children for future challenges and opportunities, while others believe that traditional academic subjects should take precedence to ensure a solid educational foundation. What is your opinion on this issue? Should schools prioritize teaching children how to be creative? Why or why not?
☆Let’s Read
Read the following articles,
underlined by yours truly Sasaki, and make sure what creativity is and how it
can be learned.
Article 1 Medical students 'raised on
screens lack skills for surgery'
Article 2 The Guardian view on creativity
in schools: a missing ingredient
☆Let’s think
1.
Is
creativity important? Why/Why not?
2.
What
subjects nurture creativity?
☆Hints for Points
Creativity
(arts, experiments, and extracurricular activities)
1.
Whether
one is creative or not will be crucial in the near future as the impacts of
climate change becomes serious and more jobs will be taken care of by AI.
2.
Real
creativity comes from real contact with nature, people, and society.
3.
Establishment
of individuality is necessary for society to evolve.
Academic
subjects
1.
Creativity
requires solid foundation, essential knowledge and skills. To create something
new, you need to know what has already been created. What you think is new
might already exist.
2.
Breakthrough
in science often comes from interdisciplinary studies, integration of academic
studies..
3.
Another
pandemic may happen. (economic conditions, social trends)
☆Sample Responses
Disagree
【Creativity】Creativity is not something that
you learn from school education but something you forget in school. Children
are naturally all creative. Yet, once they start school, they lose creativity.
Studies to get good scores in examinations of subjects in which they have no
interest stunts, I guess, the development of their neurons, which had been
budding freely by then. Long school hours and tons of homework reduce their
free time that helps children develop creativity through interaction with the
real world in each individual’s environment.
【Academic
Subjects】On
the other hand, academic subjects are indispensable to develop and mature a
creative mind. They provide knowledge and skills to understand and internalize nature,
people, and society in detail and deeply. Teachers should be here to support
children do these jobs by providing them with proper materials and assignment.
【Conclusion】What school can do is to teach
traditional academic subjects well, and therefore, although it is paradoxical,
school should not prioritize creativity so that children can grow up to be
creative.
(243 words)
Agree
【Thesis】I believe school should prioritize teaching children how to be
creative.
【Supporting Details】School has long been dead and AI has already
become smarter than many of us humans. I have no regret to say good-bye to conventional
school that teaches academic subjects and welcome a new type of school that
support children to gain creativity by experiencing various things, because AI
cannot fully replicate human experiences and thus this is the area that future
humans should explore.
【Counterargument-treatment】Although conventional knowledge may be necessary
for our creative activities, it is said that all the academic knowledge we need
can be found online.
【Conclusion】Therefore, school should support children to get ready to be humans
that can provide their personalized experiences, or individual data, for AI to
use to make the world a better place to live, as well as enjoying sharing their
precious memories with other humans through creative activities. (149 words)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。