Imagine that a company has announced plans to build a large factory
in your community. Would you support this addition to your community?
☆Let’s Think
1 What are the merits and demerits of building a factory in general?
2 Are there any conditions of your community to welcome or reject a
new factory?
3 Are there any counter arguments against the opinion that a new
factory will increase employment?
4 Are there any counter arguments against the opinion that a new
factory will have a negative effect on the environment?
Note: Let’s deal with counterarguments. When you think of a counterargument,
take it up, and deal with it by, for example, proving the counter argument does
not matter so much or showing that there is a solution.
☆Hints for Points
◍merits and
demerits of building a factory in general
advantages: It will stimulate the local economy. / The employment
will improve. / The municipal government will benefit from the tax revenue
increase.
disadvantages: air/water/noise pollution / Transportation will be
crowded. / There might be conflicts between old and new residents
◍conditions of your
community
old residential area → The health of children and might be senior citizens adversely
affected.
already full of factories → more demerits than merits
☆Counterarguments
and counter-counterarguments
◍The employment
will improve.
Counterargument: Corporations employ dispatched workers, who are
already trained to do the tasks and do not cost much, or use robots.
Counter-counterargument: The community leaders can organize
themselves to make sure that the factory will give priority to hiring residents
in the area before the construction starts.
◍effect on the
environment (pollution, CO2 emissions, habitat loss, etc.)
Counterargument: New technology will reduce the impact on the
environment.
Counter-counterargument: A corporation will do anything for profits.
It will not seriously take measures to protect the environment. Once the damage
is done, the community will never be the same.
☆Essay for Ideas and Expressions
I would
welcome the factory if it is run by a new type of company but strongly reject
it if it is owned by the conventional corporation. Although it would seemingly
benefit my town mainly because of job creation, a factory owned by the
corporation would eventually bring unhappiness to the community.
In the long
run, a corporate-owned factory would harm my community and the environment. By
law, a corporation is only responsible to its shareholders, not to the
community, and much less to the environment. If calculation shows that it can
still make profits even if it has to pay compensation for the damage caused by
the production or the products, the corporation just makes the product. As we
have seen, factories have polluted the air, water, and soil, and many people
have suffered due to defective products.
Outsourcing
is another practice to worry about. If the factory is successful, the company
wants to expand and it will close the factory to build some in overseas
countries where cheap labor forces are available. If this happens, not to speak
of the plight of the people who are exploited there in the third world, my town
will be full of the unemployed. This has happened in America over the last 20
years. The result is a lot of ghost towns and the crushed middle class. Tight
economy and harsh global market competition, plus very expensive personnel
costs of my country Japan, can transform even a paternalistic Japanese company
into a ruthless, money-hungry machine. It is sensible to suspect the possibility
of future offshoring of the factory.
Moreover, the
corporation could close even a most productive factory for profits. For example,
if the product the factory turns out is abundant in the market, the company
could stop manufacturing it to prevent its price from falling down, just as
extra crops such as oranges are discarded to manipulate the market prices, when
many people are starving, as depicted in The Grapes of Wrath half a century ago
and is being done right at this moment somewhere on this planet.
A new type of
company that I would be pleased to invite to my town is one of employee
ownership. I myself have no desire to own a company, but, in theory, I think this
system will make our lives better. Employee ownership allows all employees
literally participate in policy making. This would drive the factory to the
right direction even though the majority is not always right. For instance,
considering most ordinary citizens are concerned about environmental issues
while many large companies are still denying the global warming theory for fear
of loss caused by policy change, a company where decisions are made by workers’
majority vote is likely to emit minimum amount of CO2 and easy on the
environment in general. Needless to say, the pay gap between the officials and
the rank-and-files would be smaller because everyone is the owner of the
company. This kind of company is established by people who have values far from money-and-power orientation and
therefore, my town would be livelier with people respecting and supporting each
other.
A company as
a tool for extra-income of a few super-rich people is not welcome, while a
company of the ordinary people, by the ordinary people, for the ordinary people
is a great welcome. Increase of factories operated by this type of companies
would drastically change society.
☆Sample Essay Structures
A
【Introduction = Outline】
【Point 1】
【Point 2】
【Counterargument-treatment】*
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】
B
【Introduction = Outline】
【Good Points】
【Bad Points】
【Conditions of My Community】
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】
*Why good points are not attractive / Why bad
points do not matter
Your Sample Essay Structure
【Introduction = Outline】
【 】
【 】
【 】
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。