Material:
The following appeared in a memo
from the director of student housing at Buckingham College.
"To serve the housing needs
of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories.
Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double
over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate.
Moreover, the average rent for an apartment in our town has risen in recent years.
Consequently, students will find it increasingly difficult to afford off-campus
housing. Finally, attractive new dormitories would make prospective students
more likely to enroll at Buckingham."
Write a response in which you
discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain
how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Part of Response (Body Paragraphs):
The first evidence necessary to
evaluate the argument that Buckingham College should build a number of new
dormitories is the data that confirms the prediction that Buckingham’s
enrollment will double over the next 50 years. Specifically, increase-decrease
rates of the Buckingham College over the past decades are at least necessary.
If the change has been lasting long enough to expect the rapid increase for
another 50 years, the prediction cannot be dismissed. However, if the same kind
of sudden alteration followed by a plateau or slump happened in the past, then more
cautious watch of the trend might be needed. Also, the enrollment number
prediction should be made with overall demography change in the areas that
prospective students live in in mind. 50 years is a long span of time, which
includes more than 30-years for uncertain numbers of unborn college-bounds. If
there are rapid increases of birth rates
in the areas supported by some facts that ensure the trend will last for the
nest 50 years such as development plans in the areas would strengthen the
prediction.
Next, whether the increase of
students who choose to live in the dorms is in proportion to the increase of
enrolment or not should be confirmed. In other words, if the kind of students
that tend to prefer to live in the dormitory is on the increase, the addition of
dormitory complex is to be considered seriously. If the subset that enters the
dormitory is a fixed number of subgroup of the entire students at college, like
international students whose acceptance is limited under the present college
policy, the proportional increase of dorm-choosers cannot be expected. Also,
the trend of the college lifestyle and economic situation would be elements
that should be investigated. If affluent students who would like to live in an
apartment off campus are the increasing component of the entire college
population, new dorm rooms would become redundant, while the number of working
students who do not live with their parents are the major part of the new
students, and the economic situation underscores the prediction that this trend
continues, the argument will be strengthened.
The next verification would be
on the assumption that students would find difficulty in finding off-campus
housing. Confirmation of the absence of the plans to build reasonable apartment
complex for students turning negative will strengthen the argument. Also, trends
and forecast on rents around the university should be taken into consideration
to see if the apartment rents in the area are likely to remain the same level in
the next 50 years. If the real estate is on the downward trend in the area, the
argument will become less convincing.
The assumption that attractive
new dormitories would make prospective students more likely to enroll at
Buckingham should be taken with a grain of salt. If there are surveys providing
data related to the causal relation between new dormitories and enrollment
rates, analysis should be made to prove it. There are many elements in choosing
a university to attend, and housing may not be on the top of the prospective
students’ priority list.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。