The
necessity of teaching creativity in schools is a topic of considerable debate,
especially in our rapidly evolving world. Some argue that fostering creativity
is essential for preparing children for future challenges and opportunities,
while others believe that traditional academic subjects should take precedence
to ensure a solid educational foundation. What is your opinion on this issue?
Should schools prioritize teaching children how to be creative? Why or why not?
☆Let’s Read
Read the following articles,
underlined by yours truly Sasaki, and make sure what creativity is and how it
can be learned.
Article 1: Medical
students 'raised on screens lack skills for surgery'
Leading surgeon says lack of
hobbies and creativity in schools has affected children’s practical abilities
Matthew Weaver Oct 2018
The Guardian
Article 2
The Guardian view on
creativity in schools: a missing ingredient
Imagination should infuse
teaching of science as well as the arts. Children are not pitchers to be filled
with facts Oct 2019
☆Let’s think
1.
Why
is creativity important?
2.
How
can school teach creativity? What are creative classes?
☆Hints for Points
Creativity
(arts, experiments, and extracurricular activities)
1.
Whether
one is creative or not will be crucial in the near future as the impacts of
climate change becomes serious and more routine jobs will be taken care of by
AI.
2.
Real
creativity comes from real contact with nature, people, and society.
Academic
subjects
1.
To
create something new, you need to know what has already been created. What you
think is new might already exist.
2.
Another
pandemic may happen. (economic conditions, social trends)
☆Sample Answer
【Thesis】Although I agree with Meg in that creativity is the inspiration
that is the key to solve difficult problems and come up with new ideas, I don’t
think school should prioritize teaching creativity because in my view, school
cannot teach creativity in a real sense. It is not a subject. Thus, I think school should prioritize
providing quality education of academic subjects for children, while reducing
school hours and homework, to help their natural development of creativity.
【Creativity】Creativity is not something that you learn from school
education but something you forget in school. Children are naturally all creative. Yet, once they start school, they lose
creativity. Studies to get good scores in examinations of subjects in which
they have no interest stunts the development of their neurons, which had been
budding freely by then. Long school hours and large amounts of homework reduce
their free time, reducing their time to be creative.
【Academic Subjects】On the other hand, academic subjects are
indispensable to develop and mature a creative mind. They provide knowledge and
skills to understand and internalize nature, people, and society in detail and
deeply. Teachers should be here to support children do these jobs by providing
them with proper materials and assignment.
【Conclusion】What school can do is to teach traditionally academic subjects
well, and therefore, although it is paradoxical, school should not prioritize
creativity to help children creative. (227 words)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。