Question: Are our actions causing more harm to the environment than in the past or are we now making a stronger effort to protect and preserve it?
Discussion
1. Check out Fridays for Future and Greta Thunberg.
2. Which opinion do you agree with? Why?
☆Essays for ideas and expressions
Sample Essay 1
This essay is taken from “Writing for the TOEFL iBT, Barron’s”
Sample Essay 2
We hear things like the first statement that humankind is harming
the earth every day, and most people seem to agree with it. Let’s take a look
at the second one. It says that the idea of the first statement is an
exaggeration and that we are “making the earth a better place to live.” The
question is for whom are we making the earth a better place to live.
Humans try to change nature into what humans
want it to be. We build roads in plains and mountains for transportation, build
structures as shelters against elements and for other purposes, or make
facilities for resources such as water pipes or nuclear reactors. We build
cities so that we can fend for ourselves. However, when someone gets something,
someone else loses it. When human society gains something involving nature
(development), the environment loses something (destruction).
Effect of Human Activities, Especially in the Last 200
Years Human Activity ↙ ↘ Development of Society ⇔ Destruction of the
Environment |
When we were cavemen, most of our activities were part of
nature. Like other animals, we slept in our “nests,” and hunted and gathered
what we needed to survive. We made a fire to cook, but it was not enough to
cause global warming. We collected pretty stones and shells for some reason, and
it had little effect on the environment. Perhaps we ate a species too much and
drove it extinct, but the influence was not so strong as to change the whole
environment.
Now, highly-developed technologies allow us
to affect the environment on a large scale. We clear-cut forests to make cities
and fields; bulldoze mountains to build residential areas, to mine minerals, or
to make golf courses; and drill rocks in the desert and ocean bottoms to get
oil and gas. We also kill insects with chemicals to grow food, overfish to
satisfy our palate, and wipe out some species for the fur and skin to enjoy
fashion and hobby. In addition, we pollute the air, water, and soil for production
and transportation. Furthermore, we have started global warming by releasing a
large amount of greenhouse gases into the air.
By doing these things, we invade other
animals’ natural habitats, deplete natural resources and destroy the
environment. To survive, to expand our territories, and to enjoy ourselves, we
are doing harm to nature. It is obvious that our activities are causing
environmental strain. Our activities might make our lives convenient, but they
affect nature.
The word “ecological damage” in the writing
topic is about disturbing ecosystem and causing decline or extinction of life.
It is predicted that about one-fourth of all plants and vertebrate animals may
go extinct by 2050 due to global warming. Ecological damage is not an
exaggeration.
It is true that we cannot live like a
caveman. We need energy. We need food. Development is good for us. However, it
is usually bad for the environment, and in the end, it is bad for us as well
because humankind is part of nature.
☆Sample Response
Structures
Sample 1
【Thesis】Both scientific data and our current experiences show that we have been
pressuring the environment to the point of no return, and we are not making a
course correction.
【CO2】Global
warming is in progress. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has passed
the threshold of 350 parts per million several years ago. This means that we
cannot stop global warming anymore even if we stop burning fossil fuels right
now, and yet oil industry is still expanding. We are knowingly doing harm to
the environment as a result of big businesses prioritizing short term profits.
【Effect on the Environment】Climate crisis is clearly felt by all of us now. No one is now
opposed to the view that summer is getting hotter year by year, and the average
temperature later proves that our sense is right. The polar ice is melting in an
unprecedented rate. Fishermen report that they see different fishes from those
they used to catch, meaning fishes are moving away from warmer water. Farmers
see their crops affected by higher temperature and stronger and more frequent
disasters. Extinction is now exponential.
【Counterargument-treatment】Technologies to soften the impact of climate change exist, but governments
have little will to use them because of professional lobbysts from related
businesses. Environmental movements have not achieved a decisive success partly
because the leaders are paid by businesses according to “Planet of the Humans”.
【Conclusion】Scientists
call these changes anthropogenic climate change. There is no denying that human
activities, especially greenhouse emissions, are destruction the ecosystem and
causing our demise.
(252 words)
Assignment
・Watch the following movies for
reference:
An Inconvenient
Truth: An
Academy Award-winning documentary film in
2006 about climate change, or global warming,
presented by former United States Vice President Al Gore. Al
Gore’s claim is that global warming is real and largely human-caused. (Wikipedia)
Planet of the
Humans: A
documentary released in 2020 that has shown the failure of the environmental
movement, especially those to fight global warming and the cause of the
failure. It reports that solar, wind, and biomass power plants cannot reduce or
even increase greenhouse gasses and that the reason why this fact has not been
known is that leaders of environmental movement are paid by or making money by
owning the renewal energy companies. The criticisms about the movie have been
disproved, and it has been found that the media and pundits that criticized the
movie were paid by the “green billionaires”.
Write your response in 10 minutes. Show each other your responses.
Write down questions or suggestions to each other’s response.
DRAFT
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。