Are our actions causing more harm to the environment than in the past or are we now making a stronger effort to protect and preserve it
Discussion
1. Check out Fridays for Future and Greta Thunberg.
2. Debate on today’s topic.
☆Essays for ideas and expressions
Sample Essay 1
The quality of human life has improved greatly over the past
few centuries, but Earth is being harmed more and more by human activity. As we
develop our technology, we use more and more natural resources and cause more
and more pollution. As our population grows, we destroy more and more natural
areas in order to expand towns and cities. The Earth is being harmed, and this
harms people as well.
We often act as if we have unlimited natural resources, but
this isn’t true. If we cut down too many trees to build houses and make paper,
not all the trees will grow back. If we catch too many fish, the fish
population will get smaller and smaller. If we aren’t careful about how we use
our natural resources, we will lose many of them. We are already losing some.
We don’t seem to pay attention to the amount of pollution
human activity can cause. Our cars pollute the air. Our factories pollute both
the air and the water. We throw our waste into rivers and streams. We act as if
the air and water can clean themselves up, but they can’t.
As urban populations grow, the cities grow too, taking over
more and more land. New houses, stores, and office buildings are built all the
time. Land that was once forest or farms is now parking lots and apartment
buildings. We seem to act as if we have unlimited land, but we don’t. We need
to plan more carefully so that we use our limited land in the best way
possible.
People need to respect the Earth and try to preserve it. If
we don’t, we will lose all the natural resources that we depend on for life.
Then what will happen?
This essay is taken
from “Writing for the TOEFL iBT,
Barron’s”
Sample Essay 2
We hear talks that humankind is harming the earth every day,
and most people seem to agree with it, while we also hear that we are making
efforts to make the earth a better place to live.” The question is for whom are
we making the earth a better place to live.
Humans try to change nature into what we
want it to be. We build roads in plains and mountains for transportation, build
structures as shelters against elements and for other purposes, and make
facilities for resources such as water pipes or nuclear reactors. We build
cities so that we can fend for ourselves. However, when someone gets something,
someone else loses it. When human society gains something involving nature
(development), the environment loses something (destruction).
Effect of Human Activities Especially in the Last 200
Years Human Activity ↙ ↘ Development of Society ⇔ Destruction of the
Environment |
When we were cavemen, most of our activities were part of
nature. Like other animals, we slept in our “dens,” and hunted and gathered
what we needed to survive. We made a fire to cook, but it was not enough to
cause global warming. We collected pretty stones and shells for some reason,
and it had little effect on the environment. Perhaps we ate a species too much
and drove it to its extinction, but the influence was not so strong as to
change the whole environment.
Now, highly-developed technologies allow us
to affect the environment on a large scale. We clear-cut forests to make cities
and fields; bulldoze mountains to build residential areas, to mine minerals, or
to make golf courses; and drill rocks in the desert and ocean bottoms to get
oil and gas. We also kill insects with chemicals to grow food, overfish to
satisfy our palate, and wipe out some species for the fur and skin to enjoy
fashion and hobby. In addition, we pollute the air, water, and soil for
production and transportation. Furthermore, we have started global warming by
releasing a large amount of greenhouse gases into the air mainly by burning fossil
fuels.
By doing these things, we invade other
animals’ natural habitats, deplete natural resources, and destroy the
environment. To survive, to expand our territories, and to enjoy ourselves, we
are doing harm to nature. It is obvious that our activities are causing
environmental strain. Our activities might make our lives convenient, but they
affect nature. Now, the word “ecological damage” is about disturbing ecosystem
and causing decline or extinction of species. It is predicted that about
one-fourth of all plants and vertebrate animals may go extinct by 2050 due to
global warming. Ecological damage is not an exaggeration. The climate crisis is
real. It is man-made, and we are killing ourselves.
It is true that we cannot live like a
caveman. We need energy. We need food. Development is good for us. However, it
is usually bad for the environment, and in the end, it is bad for us as well
because humankind is part of nature.
☆Sample Response
Structures
Sample 1
【Thesis】Both scientific data and our current experiences show that we have
been pressuring the environment to the point of no return, and we are not
making a course correction.
【CO2】Global
warming is in progress. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has passed
the threshold of 350 parts per million several years ago. This means that we
cannot stop global warming anymore even if we stop burning fossil fuels right
now, and yet the oil industry is still expanding. We are knowingly doing harm
to the environment as a result of big businesses prioritizing short term
profits.
【Effect on the Environment】Climate crisis is clearly felt by all of us now. No one is now
opposed to the view that summer is getting hotter year by year, and the average
temperature later proves that our sense was right. The polar ice is melting in
an unprecedented rate. Fishermen report that they see different fishes from
those they used to catch, meaning fishes are moving away from warmer water.
Farmers see their crops affected by higher temperature and more fierce and more
frequent disasters. Extinction is now exponential.
【Counterargument-treatment】Technologies to soften the impact of climate change exist, but
governments have little will to use them because of professional lobbysts from
related businesses. Environmental movements have not achieved a decisive
success because the leaders are paid by businesses according to “Planet of the Humans”.
Their existence has been used for greenwashing in most cases.
【Conclusion】Scientists
call these changes anthropogenic climate change. There is no denying that human
activities, especially greenhouse emissions, are destructing the ecosystem and
causing our demise.
(263 words)
Assignment: Watch the following
movies for reference:
An Inconvenient
Truth
An Academy Award-winning
documentary film in 2006 about climate change, or
global warming, presented by former United States Vice President Al Gore. Al
Gore’s claim is that global warming is real and largely human-caused. (Wikipedia)
Planet of the
Humans
A documentary
released in 2020 that has shown the failure and the cause of it in the
environmental movement, especially those to fight global warming. It reports
that solar, wind, and biomass power plants cannot reduce greenhouse gasses or
even increase them and that the reason why this fact has not been known is that
leaders of the environmental movement are paid by renewal energy companies or
making money by owning them. The criticisms about the movie have been
disproved, and it has been found that the media and pundits that criticized the
movie were paid by the “green billionaires”.
Write your response in 10 minutes. Show each other your responses.
Write down questions or suggestions to each other’s response.
DRAFT
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。