Writing Topic
Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. It is more
worthwhile for a university to spend money on improving facilities than on
hiring high-quality professors.
☆Let’s Think
This question is made up of a comparison.
It compares the importance of facilities and professors for a university. Also,
the statement uses the word “worthwhile” not “important”. Does it mean that
even though high-quality professors are important, improving facilities is more
worthwhile to a university?
Let’s think about the relation between research
facilities and faculty (professors) in studies by analogy. Professors can be to
facilities what the software is to the hardware of a system. Just as good
software performs exquisitely even the hardware looks miserable as long as its
specifications are above some level, so do good professors achieve good results
even if facilities for their studies are not perfect. At the same time, if the
hardware is old and worn out, of course, nothing can make it do even a basic
task.
At the same time, university facilities
include those not only for studies but also for students such as dormitories,
gyms, and cafeteria. They may need to have features that many people are
attracted to.
For what purpose does the university exist?
Why do people go to university? What does the word “worthwhile” mean?
If you like, answer these questions before
you organize your thoughts.
1. What are the merits of spending money on
facilities?
2. What are the merits of spending money on
high-level professors?
3. For what purpose does the university exist?
4. What does the word “worthwhile” mean?
5. Is spending money on facilities more worthwhile
than on high-quality professors in realizing the answers to Questions from 1 through
3?
☆Essay for Ideas and Expressions
Both facilities and professors are
important for a university to conduct studies. However, if the statement that it
is more worthwhile for a university to spend money on improving facilities than
on hiring high-quality professors is based on the idea that university is a
business and thus its purpose is to make profits, I cannot agree with it because
in my understanding the reason for existence of university is to promote and
protect studies.
The university should provide a good
environment so that professors can do research without worrying about funding
for their studies. However, spending more money on facilities than on hiring
good professors is putting the cart before the horse. Universities cannot exist
without good researchers. While studies cannot be done well without good
equipment, abundant information that the sophisticated machines can provide is
useless without a person who knows how to use machines and how to interpret
information they produce. Also, many professors are not only top level
researchers but also very good teachers. They are some of the best, or at least
most interesting, minds students meet in their whole lives: human beings with
amazing brains and often unforgettable personalities. It is professors that
protect, improve, and increase the knowledge the university has and raise the
next generation of researchers and well-educated citizens that support
important studies.
On the other hand, in the perspective of
university as a business, spending money on the facilities might also be
crucial. Universities need to attract as many students, their customers, as
possible. Students who are purely interested in the subject they are going to
major in and choose a university with renowned professors in the field of their
interest might be minorities. A larger percentage of the young may want to
pursue a good quality of life rather than an academic success and would be more
concerned about the level of facilities related to their college life than
those of professors. For example, students who live away from home might take
good dormitory facilities into consideration in choosing a university that they
should attend. Students who enjoy sports would choose the university with sporting
facilities.
However, the main purpose of a university
is research and education. Talks about making money should be the last of its priority.
Although reality may put pressure on allocating more of its budget to other
things than hiring high-quality professors, if it gives in, it is not really
entitled to be called the highest educational institution. Instead of trying to
attract many students or trying to increase its capital by buying equities, the
university should spend money to protect its faculty.
The university is a place for studies and
studies depend on high-level professors. Therefore, it is not worthwhile for a
university to spend more money on its facilities than on its faculty. Good
professors are more important for a university than anything else, including
making a short term profit.
☆Sample Essay Structures
Sample Essay Structure 1
【Main Idea = Outline】 I agree/disagree with the
statement that … because ….
【Facility】It is worthwhile for a university to spend
money on facilities in that ….
【Professors】It is worthwhile for a university to spend
money on professors because ….
【Decisive Reason】A university should spend more money on
facilities/professors because ….
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】Because…, I think it is
more worthwhile …..
Sample Essay Structure 2
【Main Idea = Outline】 I agree/disagree with the statement
that … .The reasons are as follows.
【Reason to agree/disagree 1】First, ….
【Reason to agree/disagree 2】Second, ….
【Why the drawbacks do not matter】It is true that …, but ….
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】Since…, I cannot
disagree/agree with the idea that ….
Your Essay Structure
【Main Idea = Outline】
【Point 1】
【Point 2】
【Point 3】
【Conclusion = Wrap-up】
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。