☆Let’s Think
1.
How do primary education and
college level education differ?
2.
What are the advantages of a
good primary education?
3.
Who will benefit when college
level education is subsidized more?
☆Hints for Points
Primary
education
1.
Better primary education promotes
equity. Primary education is for everyone while college level education is for
only a small percentage of the population. Therefore, spending money on the
former is more egalitarian than the latter, all children getting more resources
for self-fulfillment, which increases opportunities to live a better life.
2.
Spending money on children would
benefit society and the government in the long run because it will narrower the
education gap. Everyone receives the primary education, so it raises the
intelligence level of the whole population, who will make good workforce and
citizens.
3.
Good primary education will
reduce the number of health and social problems. It will increase the number of
children who finish primary education and continue to middle school and higher
education. The more educated people are, the less health and social problems
they will have
4.
To find more talents, primary
education should be subsidized more. Many people who are as good as any
successful people are doing menial jobs because they were not recognized when
they were children. They could have contributed to the country if they had
received a proper primary education.
College
education
1.
Giving the smartest people an
intensive higher education will help produce experts who will build and develop
the country as quickly as possible. Better-educated students will contribute
more to innovations and inventions. Thus, it is efficient to support those who
have shown the best academic ability.
2.
Subsidizing college will help
produce more skilled and resourceful workers. This will raise productivity of
the whole society, and tax revenue will increase as a result.
3.
To revolutionize the whole
education system, the government should start with the higher education to help
change the educational concept and put new ideas into practice such as letting graduate
school-bound students teach their subjects part-time at local grade schools.
☆Response for Ideas
and Expression
I believe the government should prioritize primary education. As
Emily says, a good education during formative years is crucial because it
prepares children well for advanced level education and later life. Primary
education must provide children with not only working basic knowledge which
will smoothly introduces them into the intermediate level education but also
moral and vision about life and society that will save them from straying from
the right path. Also, allocating budget to compulsory education is more
egalitarian than doing it to higher education as the former is for all children
while the latter is only for good students. All people must be given equal
opportunities regardless of their backgrounds such as race, ethnicity, or
financial status of their family. Especially for children with any of these
disadvantages, meeting a good teacher in a good educational environment,
including good facilities like personal computers and internet access, can
greatly help them move up the social ladder. This will raise the spirit of the
whole population and will benefit the country more than supporting elites, a
small percentage of the population. Therefore, the educational institution for
everyone to jump-start their lives must be subsidized more than higher
education. (188 words)

0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。