Do you think the government should prioritize funding for primary
education or for college level education?
☆Let’s Think
1.
What are the advantages of a
good primary education?
2.
What are the advantages of
subsidizing college level education?
☆Hints for Points
Primary
education
1.
Spending money on children would
benefit the government in the long run because it will narrower the educational
gap. Everyone receives the primary education, so it raises the intelligence
level of the whole population, who will make good workforce.
2.
Good primary education will
reduce the number of health and social problems. It will increase the number of
children who finish primary education and continue to middle school and higher
education. The more educated people are, the less health and social problems
they have
3.
To find more talents, primary
education should be subsidized more. Many people who are as good as any
successful people are doing menial jobs because they were not recognized when
they were children. They could have contributed to the country if they had
received a proper primary education.
College
education
1.
In developing countries, giving
the smartest people an intensive higher education is necessary. This will help
produce experts who will build the country as quickly as possible.
2.
If the country needs good ideas
as soon as possible, it is worth spending more money on college education than
it is on primary education. Smart people pay the money back quickly with great
inventions and innovations. Thus, it is efficient to support those who have
shown the best academic ability.
3.
To revolutionize the whole
education system, the government should start with the higher education. To
build the country and raise the next generations, governments should subsidize
universities to help them change their educational concept and put their ideas
into practice.
☆Response for Ideas
and Expression
I believe the government should prioritize primary education. As
Emily says, a good education during formative years is crucial in that it
prepares children well for advanced level education and later life. Primary
education must provide children with not only working basic knowledge which
will smoothly introduces them into advanced level education but also moral and
vision about life and society that will save them from straying from the right
path. Also, allocating budget to compulsory education is more egalitarian than
doing it to higher education as the former is for all children while the latter
is only for good students. All people must be given equal opportunities
regardless of their backgrounds such as race, ethnicity, or financial status of
their family. Especially for children with any of these disadvantages, meeting
a good teacher in a good environment can greatly help them move up the social
ladder. This will raise the spirit of the whole population and will benefit the
country more than supporting elites, a small percentage of the population. So, the
institution for everyone to jump-start their lives must be subsidized more than
higher education. (187 words)
☆Response plan
Topic Sentence:
Supporting Details:
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。