Writing Topic
Consider
the following statement. The mass media (television, magazines, newspapers, and
so on) concentrate too much on the private lives of famous people. Do you agree
or disagree with this idea?
☆Let’s think
1. What does the expression “too much”
mean? When do we say it?
2. Is the broadcasting time for
gossip too much?
3. How about the contents of the
celebrity news? Do they focus on things that should be left untouched?
4. Do you agree or disagree with the
statement of the writing topic? Why?
Note: We say, “Too much!” when
something is over the necessary or acceptable amount, when something is
violating some rule, or when something is giving us or someone else pain.
☆Hints for Points
Agree
1.
Most celebrity reports can be regarded as
invasion of privacy.
2.
Media attention provides places for scapegoating,
which is a bad custom.
3. Unnecessary reports to satisfy
curiosities of audience and readers are made for profits.
Disagree
1.
Gossip accounts for only a small part of the
whole media coverage of current issues.
2.
Freedom of press should be protected by any
means. It provides important information that we should know which is often
hidden from the public.
☆Essays for Ideas and Expressions
Essay A Writing for TOEFL iBT, Barrons # 28
I think the media pay too much attention to the private
lives of famous people. They discover things that happened years ago and report
them as if they still mattered. They publicize things about famous people’s
lives that are really private, personal matters. They put out information that
could end up having a bad effect on a person’s family and personal life. They
do this just to entertain the public, but I don’t find it entertaining at all.
The media like to dig up bad information
about the past actions of famous people. They find out that a person took drugs
when he was young, or that someone was a reckless driver and caused a bad
accident. Then a person in her forties has to explain something that she did
when she was fifteen. I don’t understand how something that happened so long
ago could have any interest or importance now.
The media says that the public has the right
to know about the private actions of famous people. They say it is our right to
know if someone had an extramarital affair or didn’t pay back some money that
he owed. I say these are personal matters. We respect the privacy of ordinary
people and we should do the same of famous people’s.
The media seem to report these things
without considering what might happen as a result. Reporting on a celebrity’s
personal affairs could have an effect on that person’s family, especially the
children. A celebrity’s good name and credibility could be ruined before he or
she can prove that the rumors are false. A person’s entire career could be
ruined by something that is reported in the media.
Having details of one’s personal life reported
in public can have all sorts of negative consequences on a person’s life.
Ordinary people don’t have to suffer this sort of attention, and I see no
reason why celebrities should either.
Essay B
When we say something is too much, we mean
it crosses some line or it is doing harm, or both. Celebrity journalism makes
illegal reports and makes celebrities suffer. In competition for higher
ratings, its coverage will go over the top. Therefore, I agree with the
statement that the mass media concentrate too much on the private lives of
famous people.
Most celebrity reports are illegal. While
freedom of press is strongly protected, a person’s privacy is also protected by
law unless hiding it is seriously against public interests. Then publicizing a
famous person’s private information that has nothing to do with public
interests is illegal. Just like ordinary people, celebrities have no obligation
to make their whole lives open to public. The reason why so few law suits are
made is that there are too many cases and each case is too small, though not
trivial, to file.
In addition, innocent individuals suffer
because of celebrity journalism. Many famous people have had their lives
irreversibly affected by media reports for which they were not accountable to
the public. Some became mentally or physically ill, others died. It is clear
that media coverage about famous people has gone too far. Some gossipers might
quip that transparent private life is the price for being famous. However, the argument
is not convincing enough. The fact that Queen Elizabeth’s face without make-up
will never be in print shows that not all famous people have to show every
aspect of their lives. On the other hand, it seems that paparazzi have no
qualms about taking any kind of private pictures of pop stars. When you make
some people, especially those you consider “weaker” or “lower” than you, feel
pain while you do not do the same to others, the action is called bullying.
Gossiping can be a kind of bullying under the guise of attention.
Mass media, except for independent media,
are destined to focus too much on unnecessary topics. Like other profit-making
entities, media pursue profits, in other words, higher ratings or circulation,
and for that purpose they will do anything to attract attention. Also, like
other companies, they produce demand. Just as other companies try to sell unnecessary
things like potato chips with a new flavor, mass media try to sell insignificant
information, gossip, of which we weak humans cannot stop taking a bite. They
advertise gossip with sound bites and sensational pictures, while playing down
serious matters related to their sponsors. It is true that, to be precise,
there might be nothing that does not matter at all in this world, but watching
what kind of information we put in our head is as important as watching what we
eat.
Because most media attention on famous
people is against the law, is doing harm to innocent individuals, and is the
reflection of unscrupulous economic activities, it can be said that mass media
concentrate too much on the private lives of celebrities. If all the media
reported only what celebrities want to share with their fans, we might become
better people.
☆Making the structure of your essay
The following is the structure of Essay
B, the essay above.
Introduction
Thesis: Agree
Gist of Reasons: 1) illegal 2) harmful 3) providing unnecessary
information for profits
|
Body
Reason 1: illegal; invasion of privacy
e.g. coverage unrelated to the person’s job, beyond the bounds of
decency.
|
Reason 2: doing harm to innocent people
e.g. celebrities who became mentally or physically ill or died, a
bullying.
|
Reason 3: providing unnecessary information
e.g. pursuing higher ratings, producing demands for unnecessary
information
|
Conclusion
Conclusion
Because most media attention on famous people is against the law, is
doing harm to innocent individuals, and is the reflection of unscrupulous
economic activities, it can be said that mass media concentrate too much on
the private lives of celebrities.
|
Your Essay
Structure.
Introduction
Agree/Disagree
Gist of Reasons: 1) 2) 3)
|
Body
About Reason 1)
e.g.
|
About Reason 2)
e.g.
|
About Reason 3)
e.g.
|
Conclusion
|
Notes 1) What you write in the introduction
and the conclusion are the same but usually worded differently. Supporting
details of each reason are provided in each paragraph of the body. 2) When you take the iBT writing test, writing
a simple conclusion sentence before starting to write the whole essay would be
a good idea so that you can avoid finishing the essay without Conclusion
because of the time limit.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿
注: コメントを投稿できるのは、このブログのメンバーだけです。